AbouBenAdhem

joined 2 years ago
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If someone else posts a better comment that renders mine superfluous, I’ll often delete mine. But if someone else has already replied to mine, I’ll leave it for the sake of context but downvote it so the better one gets more visibility.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

“Kash Patel denies rumors he possesses a modicum of personal integrity.”

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Yeah, but this poll was from Gallup—who trusts them?

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (3 children)

See the Silurian hypothesis:

The Silurian hypothesis is a thought experiment, which assesses modern science's ability to detect evidence of a prior advanced civilization, perhaps several million years ago.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The problem with matter that doesn’t interact electromagnetically is that everything else can pass right through it. (That’s why dark matter theoretically remains in halos around galaxies instead of getting incorporated into galactic discs via drag from other matter.)

If dark matter can only interact via gravity, it can only attract other matter toward it (albeit very weakly)—including both matter and antimatter. So it can’t keep matter and antimatter apart.

You’d also have no way of manipulating the dark matter itself, except through gravity.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Dark matter interacts via gravity but not electromagnetism (including light). So its particles would have no electric charge, and thus no distinct antiparticles.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

If any of the polygraph operators are opposed to Patel, this would be a convenient way to get his actual loyalists fired without evidence.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I wouldn’t be surprised if forces on the ground deliberately downplayed the damage when reporting to Trump so he wouldn’t endanger them all with further escalations.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

It’s ultimately also an observation about what LLMs can and can’t be, based on the structures they’re reproducing:

Languages are systems. They can most certainly have biases, but they do not and cannot have goals. Exactly the same is true for the mathematical models of language that are produced by transformers, and that power interfaces such as ChatGPT. We can blame the English language for a lot of things. But it is never going to become conscious and decide to turn us into paperclips.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah—I just don’t understand how they disentangle the two if they’re both happening simultaneously.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I would have thought the volume of water retained on land by dams would be more than offset by the volume lost to melting glaciers.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

But if anyone knows that already, it’s FBI staff.

 

That LLMs exist; that they are capable of forming coherent sentences in response to prompts; that they are in some genuine sense creative without intentionality, suggests that there is something importantly right about the arguments of structuralist linguistics. Language demonstrably can exist as a system independent of the humans who employ it, and exist generatively, so that it is capable of forming new combinations. [...] much of what we commonly attribute to individual cognition is in fact carried out through the systems of signs that structure our social lives.

 

The scammer finds a name and a social security number. They sign up for a full course load. They stick around long enough to get their Pell grant and cash out. Then they get a new identity and start again.

 

Ghost leg is a method of lottery designed to create random pairings between two sets of any number of things, as long as the number of elements in each set is the same.

 

Inspired by bubble-net feeding among humpback whales.

 

Say we have all the empirical evidence from 19th-century science prior to the observation of the wavelike diffraction of matter particles, plus 21st-century math and theory to construct an alternative explanation.

view more: next ›