this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
98 points (98.0% liked)

Science Memes

10988 readers
2669 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] drre@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

some might regard it as a predatory publisher

[–] MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 week ago

And your email account will never recover. They'll sell it like it's going out of style.

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Thanks. It's been a long time since I left academics. I can't remember having heard of them before.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mostly it’s seen as low quality no?

The vibe I got was that they’d basically accept anything in return for money.

[–] drre@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

this is my impression. back when i still was in academia it would pop up from time to time but i never published there since i never cited any of their journals in the first place. (why would one publish there when all your peers are somewhere else). nowadays i sometimes get requests from them to my personal email for special issues which i just ignore. (it's academic spam essentially).

have a look at retraction watch https://retractionwatch.com/?s=mdpi

I’ve seen some really good papers in MDPI which challenge the consensus in different fields and I’m assuming aren’t published in bigger journals because colleagues are stuck in their own ways and disagree with the premise of the paper.

But these papers are vastly outnumbered by a mix of low quality papers and obvious corporate sponsored or “self-promotion of my new vitamin” type papers.