this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
234 points (99.2% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2292 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

North Korea is sending thousands of soldiers to support Russia in the Ukraine war, expecting compensation of $200 million annually. In return, Russia is providing North Korea with rice, advanced space technology, and potential military assistance in the event of a contingency on the Korean Peninsula.

Despite the the National Intelligence Service’s assessment that the costs outweigh the benefits, experts believe North Korea is securing a strategic advantage by aligning itself with Russia.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

nuke delivery stuff

That's what space tech means, I thought.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I doubt Russia would want that since NK is unstable and can easily point those weapons back at them at some point in the future.

[–] dlatch@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Russian decisions over the past few years haven't exactly shown much long-term strategic choices or forethought, so I doubt this is an argument for them

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Could be satellites for intelligence and all the tech that goes on it. Not the easiest stuff to develop or manufacture. If I'm Russia I would protect the family jewels (nuke and nuke delivery). If NK got rice out of the deal they're probably not jumping straight to ICBM tech.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

NK already has missile tech, just not clear whether it has real intercontinental range. The US and Russia did that in the 1950s though.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I wonder if targeting is an issue. Range is easy, accurate targeting is not.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Their recent launches have been using field Russia more commonly uses, so they might be getting Russian engines.