this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
503 points (90.8% liked)

Technology

59574 readers
3360 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Only if you assume that everything on the list was additive to the initial gifts every time. I think you can infer from the context of the song, the holiday, how gift-giving works, etc. that they were just appending to the list of gifts each day.

But those are the sort of things that LLMs are incapable of doing.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's what the lyrics say though.

On the X day of Christmas my true love gave to me, X [item], X-1 [item], etc.

The song explicitly states they give this stuff every day.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Only if you take it literally and I don't think it was intended to be taken that way.

[–] crapwittyname@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago

All songs should be taken literally, which is why I eat love and prayers, and have a restraining order against me for trying to drag Hozier into a church at knifepoint.

[–] eronth@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Either interpretation is valid, though. Either one is an absurd amount of gifts, I would not put it past the gifter to have made an extravagant display of re-giving the stuff from days before each day.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I’d be interested if this sort of exaggeration humor was common in Victorian England. Giving them all those things each day has a very “Lucy and Ethel at the chocolate factory” vibe that would be very amusing after a wassail or two.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"on the second day of Christmas my true love gave to me, two turtle doves and a partridge in a pear tree."

It takes a bit of mental gymnastics to assert that on the second day of Christmas he did not send two turtle doves and a partridge in a pear tree.

If I said yesterday I gave my friend a pork pie and today I gave my friend some spaghetti and a pork pie, you would not come to the conclusion that my friend did not receive a second pork pie.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I'd say it depends on whether you were singing it to me or not. Songs kind of have to keep these things brief a lot of the time. Also, the lyrics of this song don't make much sense to begin with. 🤷

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

I’ve always taken it as they’re tabulating the gifts:

“Wow, today he gave me three french hens! Plus I have the two turtle doves from yesterday and the partridge in a pear tree from Christmas day!”

[–] teft@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’ve never assumed that interpretation. I always thought the gifts were given each day. So you end up with twelve partridges and pear trees at the end. The song says “on the nth day of christmas my true love gave to me” doesn’t that imply you are receiving all those gifts that day?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago

I guess this also illustrates a problem. Maybe it should at least say the song has been interpreted in more than one way before doing its count.

[–] Reyali@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

This 1955 featurette interpreted it as re-gifting daily. It ends up being a LOT of birds.