U.S. News

2244 readers

5 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.

Guidelines for submissions:

Post the original source of information as the link.
If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
Social media is not a news source.

For World News, see the News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

Powderhorn@beehaw.org

What will it take for staunch Democrats to vote third party? (x.com)

submitted 6 days ago by CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work to c/usnews@beehaw.org

96 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/151111

With the dust is settling from their defeat on Tuesday, it's becoming clearer that there was some incredible malpractice going on in the Democratic party. As shown in the tweet I linked, Biden delayed dropping out even though his team knew it was going to be a complete blowout for Trump. Then, we have Harris's campaign spending over a billion dollars and still losing all of the swing states she needed to win.

For all the Democrats who would never vote Republican and would have never voted third party, are you now considering voting third party in future elections? If not, what would it take?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Despite a billion dollars in funding, the Democrats campaign didn't have a prayer either. And I have a hard time calling their platform progressive at all. Anyone who liked it more than that of the Greens or the PSL would have just voted Republican.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

You're ignoring the "prayer of winning" part. Until then, I'm voting against the bigger asshole.

[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but as it turned out, Harris didn't have a prayer either. If you weren't voting for Trump (I assume you consider him to be the bigger asshole) it didn't matter if you voted for Harris or any other candidate. So unless the Democrats make big changes to their platform and the people running their campaigns... well, it's insanity to expect a different result. There's got to be a point where progressive Democrats decide that they might as well vote with some dignity for third party candidates.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Until I have good reason to believe that my vote stands a good chance of actually mattering should I do such a thing, no. There's no way of knowing the result beforehand, so I'd rather play it safer and spend it on trying to prevent the worst possible outcome. Might not always work, but then again it might.

[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 5 points 6 days ago

In a FPTP race with a large electorate, it's a pretty safe bet that your individual vote will not matter to the outcome. That's not even considering the effect of the Electoral College.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is like survivor bias.

[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you mean. We're looking at the wreckage.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We're looking at the wreckage.

If you knew what survivorship bias was, and the example usually given for where it came from, you might see the irony in what you just said.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's the opposite though? By phrasing it this way it implies the data comes from downed fighters/bombers, aka the exact data you want to avoid that.

[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 10 points 6 days ago

Yup. In the context of the election, survivorship bias would be Democratic strategists looking at the Trump campaign and saying "we gotta get more racist". Considering at their position on immigration, that's apparently what they did.