this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
455 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3275 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

And so it begins...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That’s explicitly not allowed by the constitution. 12th amendment

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They. Do. Not. Care.

You still don't get this?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The point is if they do not care, they wouldn't even bother to pretend. He'd just stay in office or run again.

The dance of running as VP doesn't make any sense as either they don't care and it's not necessary, or they do care and that's not a loophole that exists.

Besides, IIRC Kanye and Trump had a falling out over a suggestion that Trump would take a backseat to Kanye in a campaign. Trump won't settle for even the appearance of 'second place'.

[–] pornpornporn@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's already established that the 14th amendment doesn't apply to him, so why would the 12th?

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You know as well as I do the 14th is very vague and up for interpreting what a traitor is. The partisan Supreme Court already decided he’s not a traitor. Let it go already.

The 12th is not vague and would need a super majority to override.

[–] pornpornporn@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And you know as well as I do that my point is: the law doesn't apply to trump.

The only justice that might catch up with him is a heart attack from all the hamberders, but if that doesn't happen by 2028 the supreme court will find some excuse for why he should be able to get a third term and approve it with a 6-3 vote

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Supreme Court does not create laws. They interpret. When the law says “But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States,” there is nothing for them to interpret. It’s there in black and white.

[–] rimmedalpha@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 2 days ago

Yes, but the 28th Amendment written on this McDonald's napkin says he can totally do this.