this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43392 readers
1476 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I already get rate-limited like crazy on lemmy and there are only like 60,000 users on my instance. Is each instance really just one server or are there multiple containers running across several hosts? I’m concerned that federation will mean an inconsistent user experience. Some instances many be beefy, others will be under resourced… so the average person might think Lemmy overall is slow or error-prone.

Reddit has millions of users. How the hell is this going to scale? Does anyone have any information about Lemmy’s DB and architecture?

I found this post about Reddit’s DB from 2012. Not sure if Lemmy has a similar approach to ensure speed and reliability as the user base and traffic grows.

https://kevin.burke.dev/kevin/reddits-database-has-two-tables/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wouldn't that create a natural balance though? A large instance starts struggling so people are incentivised to move to smaller instances or start new instances and so spread the load more evenly. That's how it would scale. I'm surprised how many of the larger instances haven't closed signups yet but that wouldn't be a bad thing if they did.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The issue isn't on the user end, but the sub end since that is where all the data is stored.

So, according to your proposal, the best thing a sub should do when it is getting popular is to go private with its existing subscribers and any new people who want to participate should go create their own sub in a different instance.

[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wasn't talking about subs, I'm talking about when an instance gets too popular. Ideally you'd want lots of small instances, ideally communities should be spread evenly as well and if your users are spread out that should happen more or less naturally.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago

Where do you think the main costs of internet traffic and data are?