this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
294 points (99.7% liked)

Privacy

1382 readers
5 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 77 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They don't fucking own you.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 32 points 2 months ago

They sure as hell act like it though

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Well for one, I'm glad law enforcement are required to have body cams for accountability. Imagine if police unions lobbied so that the body cam requirement is be removed because of privacy reasons.

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 53 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Except they have full control over those cameras and the footage they record.

Anytime there’s misconduct they just refuse to release the footage or they turn off the camera.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We should have civil rights organizations be in charge of the footage.

Make them automatically upload to ACLU servers.

Police brutality plummets.

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Except even when they are filmed nothing happens, they just get paid leave or shuffled to another department.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Before video evidence became a thing, almost 0% of police brutality would face any consequences. With video, its now non-zero, should be ideally at 100%, but getting the statistic away from 0% is a great start. The murderer of George Floyd would've walked away without video evidence. When there's more cameras, the odds of punishment is better than without cameras.

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

That’s a fair point, I’m just skeptical how much of a difference a new tech gadget can make on systemic issues.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

At least then the victim's family can get a wrongful death payout. It would be even better if they abolished qualified immunity.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 2 months ago

It’s fine for cops to have less privacy than normal workers, considering they are given much more responsibility and power.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Those cameras aren't pointing at them. This was pointed at her.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago

They are recording what the police do and say. It clearly doesn't make a difference that the camera is technically pointing away from them. Do you think this person would have been ok with wearing a corporate bodycam because it isn't pointing at her? No obviously not.

The thing that is different is that police have control of it, and they generally only use it in public where there's no expectation of privacy, and they're the bloody police and have guns and kill people!