this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
712 points (96.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9807 readers
12 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

BTW the tank has a better forward view than the truck

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 46 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

FTR I hate this pickup and agree with the sentiment of this photo, but I feel like there's some skewed perspective tricks going on based on this manually photoshopped drag to relocate (no resizing of anything in photo) to demonstrate.

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I think the perspective issue is that the person you've dragged down is further back than the bicycle. Try dragging them just in front of the bicycle by the tank and I think they'll still look tiny.

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That's kind of the point. If you compare where the camera is in both pictures:

In the tank photo, based on that you can slightly see the top of the Tank Hull, and are looking down at the 2 service members right side that the camera is roughly in line with where the tank barrel joins with the turret. Photographer is likely standing on something, or using a tall tripod.

In the truck photo, you can see the top of the bike seat and the underside of the side mirror so the camera is roughly in line with the gas cap. Photographer is crouched.

Combine that change in height with the use of a shorter lens which quickly distorts the size (service members close and huge vs. dragged person on top of turret looks tiny) and you can see that it isn't a truly fair comparison.

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Idk what tank this is, but the M1 Abrams is 26 ft long and the F350 is ~21 with the extra seats, I don't think the comparison is unreasonable. There might be some perspective distorting things (doesn't look like a 20-25% difference there) but... Not all that much really.

[–] wieson@feddit.org 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Why'd you shrink the wank tank down in your collage?

I can clearly see the bike wheels are different sizes.

Also, I don't think perspective does much here. The bike stands flat against the object in both photos.

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 2 points 4 weeks ago

It hasn't been resized. You're seeing things.