this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
246 points (92.7% liked)

Technology

60036 readers
2680 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Theres two ways of looking at safe systems,

  • People are idiots and will get themselves hurt. The machine should prevent them to keep them safe at all costs.

Or

  • without guardrails, people are vulnerable idiots and I am too. Let the machine prevent them until they understand and accept the risk.

As memtioned elsewhere in the thread, political pressure prevents implementation of safe systems. I absolutely love safeguards and being safe because foot guns are nasty. (Its why Rust is a great language.) but I will fight against things clearly created under the former philosophy because it locks people out of their own property. Because sometimes the "safety" is an excuse for controlling behavor.

[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's a programing term that comes from the phrase "shooting yourself in the foot". Come to think about it, a loaded gun is a great example of safety mechinisms.

[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yep that makes sense. Thanks!