this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
114 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22341 readers
137 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CTHlurker@hexbear.net 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why the hell is Combat Liberalism on the beginner list???? Sure, it's easy to read and a quick one at that, but it's not helpful in the slightest for understanding Marxism (or Leninism for that matter).

Also Jakarta Method as Advanced Theory is strange as hell, since it's like the most beginner friendly book on that entire list and requires almost no prior knowledge to understand.

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yea, putting Combat Liberalism at the front implies a call to action before reading theory, aka it sets up the reader to go online and debate endlessly without knowing theory. It's silly, and is totally not exactly what I used to do before taking theory seriously hahahah of course not hahhaha kobeni-sweat

Truly all the theory teaching I do on my Lemmy.ml account is punishment for years of thinking I knew what Marxism was after reading the Manifesto and Socialism: Utopian and Scientific alone...

Same with Oppose Book Worship, like, at the beginning of a reading list and not at the end, a text focusing on touching grass and really working can be a double-edged sword. The central idea is to do both, read and practice, but with 2 summaries of summaries of the basics under your belt you aren't at risk of only reading yet, right? Just confusing.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't know that sounds perfectly in line with the ideology of the online left blob-no-thoughts

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Truly the twelfth type of Liberalism, debating online without reading... So much wasted time... sadness

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They should make a website where they do exactly that. Let's call it something after a geometrical shape and an ursine creature. comfy

[–] The_sleepy_woke_dialectic@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Combat liberalism is just yourlogicalfallacyis.com for leftists.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh boy that's an inflammatory assertion right there, I love it

[–] The_sleepy_woke_dialectic@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I asked Mao and he said I'm right and he's very disappointed in you all.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thank God I'm not a moaist or else I'd actually be upset.

[–] The_sleepy_woke_dialectic@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's right! Aren't you the one who posted the legendary "I'm literally an anarcho-tankie" post on the subreddit way back when?

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I don't think so, my claim to fame on the old sub was a proposal so cringe I got roasted non-stop for a week straight. It was so bad i wish i was the poster that coined the "I'm literally an anarcho-tankie!"

I won't declare what kind of content I made that got me roasted because I'm burying that past name in an unmarked grave.

Oh, sorry! I don't think I ever knew of it whatever it was rat-salute-2