this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

13405 readers
8 users here now

All things programming and coding related. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Even through it has some flaws, e.g. it's not fully memory safe (there are some programming languages that are even safer, like Ada)?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OmgItBurns@discuss.online 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I was looking into Rust a few months ago and noticed that most jobs listed seemed to be Web 3, crypto scams. It doesn't seem to be in high demand, from the corporate side of things.

Corporate wants people to port their COBOL code into Java 8.

Most of them have decided on a tech tech a decade ago and they're not going to change anything about it unless they absolutely have to, whether that's Java or C# or Python or Ruby..

Rust is gaining traction, but mostly for new projects or big revamps, and there's a lot more shitty old code to maintain than there are opportunities to develop anything new. Besides, most companies don't need Rust (or C or C++ for that matter), JVM/.NET/NodeJS/Go is fast enough for even intense corporate workloads and doesn't require people to put in the effort to make everything perfectly sound.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

I expect Rust to be inevitable in embedded development, but yeah, that space moves slow, so give it another ten years or so. I will say that embedded is practically jumping on Rust, compared to how glacially it normally moves. You've got big vendors committing to offering Rust APIs, because many of their customers just don't want to code C/C++ anymore.

Corporates are still looking for Java 1.8 Or so I've heard.