this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
77 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8248 readers
119 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's not illegal in Norway anymore but I still don't intend to do it because of the fumes. Also I am American but presumably "if she's not American" really means "if she doesn't live in the USA". This may or may not be pedantic to point out.
It’s pedantic, but not really wrong. The US are just some self-centered bastards and the programming can be tough to throw off. Even the acronym US could technically apply to Mexico, who’s full name is “United States of Mexico”
I wouldn't say it has anything to do with Americans being self-absorbed, just the assumption that most people live in their country of birth, or the habit of referring to people primarily as their current place of residence.
The use of American for a country rather than the entire continent from Canada to chile is what I was referring to
All English alternatives are subpar at best. I use Yank to be pejorative to them but otherwise they're Americans to me.
Edit: Also what's more useful, to have a term for a group of people as disparate as Canadians, Mexicans, Surinamese, and Brazilians, or to have a term for people from the US?
People from the Caribbean and any country south of the US: Latin Americans.
People from a country north of the US: KKKlanadians.
People from the US: Uᛋᛋian.
And that works for you!
To be clear, the reason why I wanted to point out that "being American" is a different thing from "living in the USA" was really just to poke at how people in the USA think of national identity vis-a-vis land/birthplace/residency.
Which is to say, I feel like many people in the USA have practically umbilically tied their sense of national identity to the land: they consider themselves Americans because they live in or were born in the USA, right? And I feel like this conception makes the continued rule of the land by the USA both completely natural and absolutely necessary in their eyes: any threat to the USA's rule is also on some level a threat to their own personal identities.
Likewise those like me, who manage to be American without this umbilical cord plugged into the land, end up triggering cognitive dissonance among the USA's patriots. Patriots loathe the idea that you can be American without having been born in nor ever having lived in nor even desiring to live in the USA, because if you can just do that — i.e. if Americans can basically just become a diaspora minority group laying claim to not even a single square inch of land — then what the Hell's even the point of the USA continuing to exist? There is no answer to this question other than that the USA has no reason to exist, and in fact should not continue to exist. But if this is a conclusion that you cannot accept, then, well...
In any case, use of the terms America or American to refer to the whole continent from Tierra del Fuego to Greenland is a different matter.