Technology

37826 readers

450 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

108

Discussion: Cybertruck involved in attempted bombing in Las Vegas auto-locked after explosion (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/technology@beehaw.org

57 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/police-investigating-vehicle-explosion-trump-hotel-las-vegas/story?id=117252987

The sheriff said Tesla CEO Elon Musk helped the investigation by having the truck unlocked after it auto-locked in the blast and giving investigators video of the suspect at charging stations along its route from Colorado to Las Vegas.

What if this hadn't been purposeful but an accidental blast... and the doors auto-locked someone inside? Do you need Musk's personal cell number to be able to get out alive? What even is this?

Seriously, how are Tesla's not widely considered dangerous deathtraps at this point.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

the lock is implemented in software

things that are such absurd design failures it's hard to say with a straight face

[–] Celestus@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don’t see that as a design failure. I actually really like them. Electronic door controls both inside and out, plus a mechanical backup only inside. It’s not a perfect design, but neither are mechanical door controls. It’s also not unique to Tesla: many other cars have electronic door actuators with software locks

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

other modern cars doing bad design is a known problem yes. im just hearing described differences but no benefits personally.

[–] Celestus@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

I’m not an automotive engineer, so I don’t have a great understanding of the benefits as perceived by auto manufacturers. Still, here are some benefits as I see it:

Cheaper (fewer parts)
More reliable (fewer moving parts, cables strained less frequently, fewer broken door handles)
Recessed door handles are more aerodynamic (not necessarily an advantage of electronics)
Remote door release (helps with frozen handles in the cold)
Cool factor (helps sell cars)
Flexible design (allows designers to do creative things with door handles/controls)