this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
113 points (93.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

57221 readers
805 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

FBI finally gets the memo that, yes, other people can find and use mandated back doors

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The problem is that the government is speaking out of both sides of it's mouth.

https://www.techpolicy.press/the-fbi-wants-you-to-know-it-has-not-changed-its-position-on-encryption-and-thats-a-problem/

Dec 20, 2024

But at an important meeting of experts this week in Saudi Arabia, an FBI official appeared to take a different view, one that suggests the FBI’s perspective on encryption has shifted very little. The annual UN Internet Governance Forum happening in Riyadh this week was a crucial moment to talk about encryption, and the FBI convened a panel to discuss encryption in the context of child safety, of which I was a speaker and including other experts from the UK, Australia, New Zealand, and the US. During the session, FBI section chief Katie Noyes said, “We are very supportive of encryption technologies. We just want them to be managed in a way, much like in telecommunications.”

Similarly, in a video posted by the agency two weeks ago, FBI Assistant Director Bryan Vorndran said, “The FBI has been really, really consistent about our stance on lawful access encryption. We're actually big, big supporters of it, but it has to be reasonably responsibly managed so that we can get what we need on the other side.”


This source is a little older, but it also shows why it's not as simple as the US just getting over it. There are information sharing agreements among the Five Eyes that pushes them all toward backdoor encryption access. This is an older article, but it helps confirm that these five countries are hardline gunning down the path towards encryption backdoors and hasn't ever really stopped. It will take more than Salt Typhoon for them to really get the message I think.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/12/five-eyes-warn-tech-firms-that-encryption-creates-severe-risks.html

Ministers from the U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia and New Zealand published a statement Sunday calling on the tech industry to develop a solution that enabled law enforcement to access tightly encrypted messages.

“We urge industry to address our serious concerns where encryption is applied in a way that wholly precludes any legal access to content,” the statement, which was signed by U.S. Attorney General William Barr and U.K. Home Secretary Priti Patel, said.

[–] plasticcheese@lemmy.one 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“We are very supportive of encryption technologies. We just want them to be managed in a way, much like in telecommunications.”

I just threw up a little bit

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

Yeah that telecommunications part is working out great right now, huh? Well, i guess we just gotta keep fighting them.