this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
427 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19072 readers
5139 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

China is behind the largest known covert propaganda operation ever identified on Facebook and Instagram, according to a new report by security researchers at Meta.

Meta on Tuesday outed the authors of a four-year long influence campaign dubbed “Spamouflage Dragon,” which first appeared in 2019 to spread propaganda about Hong Kong’s pro-democracy protests. Since then, the campaign has focused on spreading disinformation about the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, attacking dissidents and critics abroad, criticizing the United States, and attempting to sow division during the 2022 midterm elections.

For years, researchers have speculated that the voluminous Spamouflage Dragon posts were connected to the Chinese government but have been unable to publicly prove a link until now. The link comes courtesy of overlapping content found in both Meta’s report and charges filed against Chinese intelligence operatives back in spring.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't know why the expectation exists that they should want to build an audience. You don't need to build an audience to cause chaos. You just need the chaos message to generate enough noise to confuse people.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or this is just the smoke screen actions and there are much more extensive actions that might actually be working on the rest of the platforms.

[–] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Also, Facebook was in bed with Cambridge Analytica, it could be hiding that part.

[–] zephyreks@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Half a million people is a drop in the market by almost any measure.

Put it this way: if you had half a million followers on TikTok, would you be happy? Not really.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except they're not trying to monetize, so they don't care. They're trying to encourage disruption, which even one unstable individual can go out and do.

Given how close some of our recent elections have been, and in the closest one, how different the very straight-laced Al Gore and more cowboy/frat boy George W were, it doesn't take many people to create a huge shift in how our country approaches things for a period of time.

One of the two rejected global warming, the other made a documentary about it, as an example of how different the candidates were.

[–] zephyreks@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No government is going to toss millions of dollars at a project that gets no results

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Results for them has nothing to do with "an audience". I have an audience right now, but I don't have "an audience". Do you understand the difference I'm referring to?