this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
2272 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

60787 readers
3764 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

I just wish we had a bit more political balance here... I'm not talking about fascists, but more people that don't blame everything on capitalism would be kind of nice...

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

[Entire world on fire] "I just wish everyone wasn't so fixated on discussing the fire, how it started and who's responsible..."

You have to realize how mesmerizingly obtuse your comment is?

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 35 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Not trying to get into a whole ugly thing, just curious what your pro-capitalism stance is. Because I would definitely fall into this big Lemmy category of seeing 90-905% of modern problems being rooted in capitalism. So I would (civilly!) disagree, no doubt. Doesn’t mean we can’t have a reasonable discussion!

[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 8 points 1 day ago

I don't have much time and energy for long discussions, but I just wanna share my feelings.

I feel like people here see capitalism as a very black and white thing. Either it's there and corrupting everything or it's gone and everything is awesome. Personally I don't think that's the case. In my opinion there are some cases where the market can solve things more efficiently than a government institution, granted that this market is regulated and controlled by the government. I'm against unbounded capitalism like we see way too often nowadays.

But here in western Europe, while certainly not perfect, the situation is way better than in the US. The government controls companies, gives them a slap on the wrist if they get too greedy. And while it still poisons a lot that it touches, the competitive aspect of it also makes sure that many inefficiencies are cut. In my opinion even we are not regulating it enough, and I do consider myself left-wing. But completely abolishing capitalism doesn't make sense to me either.

I think some things are better left to the government, stuff like healthcare, public transport, utilities like water or maybe even energy. Other things are better left private (but regulated): restaurants, barbers, supermarkets, most product development like phones, cameras, cars, computers, etc. There's a huge grey area there that I don't really have an opinion on.

But I don't see how a society without capitalism can provide stuff like decent smartphones, game consoles, restaurants, festivals, etc. These more "luxury" goods rely on competition to innovate and provide decent experiences, and here capitalism works better in my view.

[–] lengau@midwest.social 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would also be interested in a defence of capitalism that doesn't come down to "but the USSR" or similar.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even Karl Marx noted capitalism's dynamism and ability to cause change. In my own case, I went from poverty to modest wealth in a capitalist system, and I know many others who had similar experiences. I'm also aware that it empowers sociopaths, causes corruption, of its tendency to degenerate to oligopoly, and its failure to adequately address externalities.

And there are many, many variants of capitalism. The one now prevalent in the US is one of the more lethal strains. Improperly regulated capitalism such as that is a nightmare. Properly regulated, many of its negative features can be mitigated. I could stand living in a social democracy until a better alternative is piloted and proven.

[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah I agree with this as well. It's not a binary view: either for or against capitalism. You can disapprove of everything happening in the US right now and still be for some form of capitalism.

Most people I know think that the US has gone way too far with their strand of capitalism, and yet they almost range from the complete left-to-right in terms of Dutch politics. Only the very right wing people here think that the US is doing something good right now. The rest, from center-right (or even proper neoliberal) all the way to the commies see a system that is failing in some way.

Yet on Lemmy this nuance seems completely lost sometimes. You're either a part of the capitalists/liberals and therefore approve of the oligarchy and dystopian capitalism in the US, or you join the radical "destroy capitalism" views. It's gotten better after the insane people from Hexbear left tho

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, because I consider myself a pretty reasonable person. People have a big problem these days of never engaging with nuance, no matter how much you try to bring any conversation back to it. Things are definitely not as binary as people seem to only be able to conceive of them. The entire world and even the most seemingly clear cut issues have loads of grey area that people just can’t discuss because as soon as you say, “yes, I agree we need to ____! But we need to discuss the trickier parts” it turns into a witch hunt for anyone pointing out anything that might be considered a tricky part because it goes against the “I’m 100% on this side and it’s the only right opinion.”

It’s frustrating.

[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Human greed is not because of capitalism. Humans have been greedy from the very beginning.

The issue is greed, it's the core problem in all these human systems, even democracy main issue is how greedy the politicians get.

You don't solve greed by getting rid of capitalism, there seems not to be a solution for greed.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I mean, I mostly agree with this. You can boil any problem down to existence. And existence down to molecular processes.

But two things: discussing modern problems, it’s all built on systems. And the system we deal with is capitalism.

Human fallibility is the problem, ultimately. But there is no overcoming human fallibility. So building systems that place peoples well being above all else is an actionable solution. Whereas solving human fallibility isn’t.

And secondly, hierarchy in all its forms. Which I would argue is the problem boiled down past the system to look at its problematic parts. Does a system rely on or serve needs in a hierarchical manner? Then that’s the problem.

That’s as far as I think is logical to go. Digging down further to human nature is a problem for a utopian society to deal with, and that we are nowhere near to achieving. So, my point is we need to deal with the first layer of problems. And that would be capitalism. Abolishing hierarchy in all its forms comes second.

The first because the system rewards the worst parts of our nature. The second because it’s almost uniformly led to corruption. Those are the root problems, from my point of view. Human fallibility is, I’m afraid, baked into the cookie. But removing systems that reward those errors instead of eradicating them should be job one.

[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Then the problem lies with democracy not with capitalism.

Capitalism is an economic system, the "first layer of problems" as you call them would be the systems we use every day and those systems have been built by the government.

What is the difference between US and Germany? Both are capitalist nations, but one is socialdemocracy and the other isn't.

But I would argue a country with two parties isn't really a democracy.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

LOL. I'm not pro-capitalism, but thank you for proving my point.

I actually think, as one example, the US's healthcare system should 100% be socialized.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Proving your point…about what? I was just curious to hear someone’s thoughts who went against the idea that most modern problems can be traced back to the roots of capitalism. But fuck me, right?

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Public provision of services is not socialism, it's just common sense. The first mass state pension system was rolled out by that crusty reactionary Bismarck. Every rightwing country still has fire departments and (mostly) public road systems too. Not doing it that way is just stupidity, not ideology.

What is socialism is when people doing the work have control of the means of production. Control, not a token share. One example is cooperatives. By this definition (which goes back to Karl Marx), neither the USSR nor Communist China were socialist, they were totalitarian state capitalist entitites. China still is, though less incompetent than under Mao. And this isn't some revisionist point of view. Rosa Luxemburg and other contemporaries saw it happening at the onset.

[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The public healthcare and pension fund that Spain used today were created during the fascist dictatorship, as many other things that just made sense.

As I said in another post, the main issue is greed. Why does the US don't have a public healthcare system? Because of greed. It's so obvious humanity has classified greed was a problem for centuries.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Perhaps it is balanced you just want it to be more in line with your views?

I have never met anybody who said “yes, this community is perfectly balanced.” Everyone always thinks it needs to get more in line with their beliefs and values

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Too late, capitalism is the problenz

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes, it is. But it's not the only problem... In fact, there are a thousand other problems I wish we could all discuss with at least half the fervor as this topic.

But no. This is the topic.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Be the change, make some posts!

[–] Balthazar@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

I'm sorry bud, but that's how the rumour mill worked since humans could talk. The message your trying to bring is good, don't get me wrong. You are trying to currently change human nature somewhat.

[–] nekbardrun@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

There are a few misconceptions in your comment:

While I do agree that there are other problems like racism and bigotry which existed before capitalism (based on an answer you gave in another comment) and while I do agree these also need to be addressed, I do disagree that capitalism isn't a major source of problems of modernity.

Why?

Because the cornerstone of capitalism is to use money to generate more money in a feedback loop towards (nonexistent) "infinite money" (which is different from feudalism, roman empire or ancient Egypt which all had some sort of market without being capitalist economies).

SInce it is impossible to make infinity money, an inherent part of capitalism are the crises cycles of boom and bust.

It also makes the creation of services as an afterthought (because making money is more important) and it is also tied to the enshitfication we're seeing today.

 

I think you're calling as "capitalism" a thing that is actually "technological innovation (under capitalism)"

We're all aware of free/open source softwares

We're all aware that it is possible to develop technological innovation outside of capitalist framework (and again: Capitalism = Using money to make more (infinite) money)

almost all of scientific researches advances are because of passion of the researches instead of the greed of capitalism.

Yes... Everyone "needs" money to survive. But I hope you do agree that nobody in the world needs billions of dollars to simply survive.

for God's sake, a lot of people living in "third world" dream of earning 300 dollars a month to survive and consider that making 1000 dollars a month is a small luxury (I'm from brasil and 1000 dollars is around R$ 4000 or R$ 5000 while most people lives with R$3000 or less)

What I'm saying is that, past the required money for surviving and for having a few "luxuries", there is no need for anyone having millions or billions of dollars every month and that it would be possible to keep scientific and technological grow under such conditions because curiosity and desire for changes are part of human nature.

if it was entirely impossible for humans to develop things without being paid before, then nothing around open/free software would exist.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder what else is to blame ?

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Human nature? Greed? Racism? Biggotry?

There's an upsetting number of topics... And now I'm depressed. Because life is depressing when you think about it too much, isn't it?

[–] manicdave@feddit.uk 11 points 1 day ago

So, capitalism then.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It sure is. It's important to touch grass on a daily basis to stay sane. I personally go outside take a stroll and caress some leaves.

Regarding your initial point : I see "capitalism" as the family of systems that enable that kind of IT monopoly. Sure, human traits such as greed and bigotry are probably the source of evil but it seems to me they have to be tapped, and enabled. The fact that the conversation often ultimately turns back to capitalism is legitimate imho.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If nearly everything currently wrong with the country weren't due to capitalism run amok I could sympathize. But unfortunately it's not the 1960s anymore.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

(segregation was a legacy of capital interests pushing race theory to justify slavery)

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I mean I understand the 1950s and 1960s werent some utopia either, but before we just let capital run everything some aspects were better.

[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

For real. I once had the misfortune to admit to having some Centrist ideas, and the down votes were immediate and generous. No discussion, just personal attacks.

And we wonder how things got to where they are.

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Sorry this is a platform for people if you're an ostrich then please go back to sticking your head in the sand

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Even ostriches aren't actually stupid enough to do that.

I'm not Dee Renolds, but you may think of me as such, if it makes the world feel safer for you.