Edit: Jesus fuck Lemmy, take a chill pill. It's making fun of the outrage, I didn't mean for it cause more of it.
this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
-76 points (12.7% liked)
Conservative
416 readers
162 users here now
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I hate the term for free speech. While I strongly believe in free speech. Nothing is absolute nor should it be.
You can't really pick and choose with free speech. It's sorta all or nothing with these things. If you say "well let's make a few rules about these words". Who decides which words? Do they ever get updated? Does each banned word or phrase get voted for if it stays banned or not? Is this a federal crime or a state issue? What's the punishment?
I think the current system of all things are legally fair game, but socially some things shouldn't be said or used in certain ways is perfectly fine. It sorta self updates and corrects with time, but it leaves open the option to say anything if need be.
I understand people not liking certain language, but often times they don't see the issue with legally banning things they don't like. They aren't thinking ahead to the possibility where there are things they would like to say and now cannot.
It isn’t all or nothing. The line is easy. We have lines currently. You can’t say you’re going to go murder someone with the intent and ability to do it. That’s illegal.
Oh ffs not this free speech dance again. Yes you can't make threats against people. That's not protected speech that's just a threat. In that case none of the words are against the law to use, but it's how you combined them and directed them at someone that becomes illegal. You also can't yell fire in a crowded building as that is considered inciting a riot or whatever. Again the words themselves are not against the law it's when and how they are used that is an issue.