Privacy

32947 readers

326 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Ross Ulbricht (aka Dread Pirate Roberts) Pardoned by Donald Trump (youtu.be)

submitted 22 hours ago by turkalino@lemmy.yachts to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 16 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

The court has no evidence that he ordered murders and dismissed the charges in such a way that they can never be filed again.

Right after Ross’s arrest, prosecutors in the state of Maryland filed a separate indictment that contained the only allegation of murder-for-hire ever filed against Ross. The indictment referenced an alleged hit on Curtis Green, a Silk Road administrator (more on Curtis Green below). For nearly five years, that indictment was left untouched, unprosecuted. Eventually, in July 2018, the District of Maryland dismissed it with prejudice, meaning it can never be re-filed or used against Ross again.[3][4]

The PDF referenced in 3: https://freeross.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Doc_14_Dismissal_Indictment_7-26-2018.pdf

Quoted site: https://freeross.org/false-allegations/

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

The court has no evidence

Not beyond reasonable doubt, no. But there was a preponderance of evidence, according to the court. I'm sure you already know this.

In criminal law you need overwhelming proof. So I agree with you, it's absolutely correct that he was not found guilty of this.