this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
2185 points (94.1% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2650 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] havokdj@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I completely agree with everything you said except for ONE little thing:

You are grossly misrepresenting how far that can is kicked down, for the worse. It doesn't kick it down a couple thousand years, it kicks it down for if DOZENS of millennia assuming we stay at the current energy capacity. Even if we doubled or tripled it, it would still be dozens of millennia. First we could use the uranium, then when that is gone, we could use thorium and breed it with plutonium, which would last an incomprehensibly longer time than the uranium did. By that point, we could hopefully have figured out fusion and supplement that with renewable sources of energy.

The only issue that would stem from this would be having TOO much energy, which itself would create a new problem which is heat from electrical usage.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then you just move the planet slightly further away from the sun! Problem solved!

[–] figaro@lemdro.id 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No man you gotta move the moon closer, since it's cold

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I like the cut of your jib, sir.

[–] schroedingershat@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The U235 is good for about 3 years, and pinning everything on something that has never had more than a half proof of concept is a bad choice.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

As if breeder reactors don't exist