this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
1629 points (96.0% liked)

Comic Strips

13417 readers
2649 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Depends on your goal. Short communications make bigger impacts.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You're right! You know what I could have said instead?

Who could have guessed that the rich white South African would turn out to be a white supremacist?

See the flaw in using too few words?

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I don't see any flaw. The meaning of that sentence is very clear.

If the post lead with that then maybe there wouldn't be any complaints.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It literally DOES start with that! That's the top level comment, word-for-word, which at least two people were too thick to understand. So yes, I gave a longer explanation, like I apparently must also provide to you.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You asked "Am wrong?".

The content was fine but Your post was not as clear as the top post. That's what was wrong.

Yes, I added shiny metaphors, explications and implications, because the subtext of the original post was apparently utterly lost on both of them.

Why use many word when few do trick? Because some people don't understand the few words.

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Says someone who's brain is rotten from the internet. "Nah miss me with those books fam, if you can't say it in one sentence like a viral tweet then I simply can't use my brain."

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You wrote a lot of words, but your argument is unclear.

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't conflate an argument being unclear, with you having trouble understanding it

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't assume anything about anyone you've just met.

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've made no statement about you. So, your response is a bit weird.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

with you having trouble understanding it

That was a "you" statement.

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The argument is that the explanation was valid, and whether or not you found it valid, is more to do with your inability to get it. Now, this isn't saying anything about you, because you might get it. So, the "you", is not the particular you, but rather "one such that would meet the requirement". But hey, you do you.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

"Nah miss me with those books fam,."

Is not a clear explanation.