this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
1630 points (96.0% liked)

Comic Strips

13417 readers
2649 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You're right! You know what I could have said instead?

Who could have guessed that the rich white South African would turn out to be a white supremacist?

See the flaw in using too few words?

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I don't see any flaw. The meaning of that sentence is very clear.

If the post lead with that then maybe there wouldn't be any complaints.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It literally DOES start with that! That's the top level comment, word-for-word, which at least two people were too thick to understand. So yes, I gave a longer explanation, like I apparently must also provide to you.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You asked "Am wrong?".

The content was fine but Your post was not as clear as the top post. That's what was wrong.

Yes, I added shiny metaphors, explications and implications, because the subtext of the original post was apparently utterly lost on both of them.

Why use many word when few do trick? Because some people don't understand the few words.