this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
2185 points (94.1% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2686 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uis@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Disproven by Russia. Maybe sometimes core is replaced because it uses unsafe design by current standards like in St. Petesburg.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Russia isn't really known for their safety rules. A lot of those reactors are running way past their expiration and are deteriorating past the point where they should be running.

It's a finite fact. A reactor has a lifetime to it, then it needs to be replaced. Unlike other mechanical devices/engines it can't be serviced because of the radiation involved.

[–] uis@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Russia isn't really known for their safety rules.

Agreed except nuclear. After Chernobyl there were no Nuclear Power Plant accidents in any post-Soviet country. Iven the scale of corruption in country I'm surprised.

A lot of those reactors are running way past their expiration and are deteriorating past the point where they should be running.

It depends how you define expiration. ISS expired like 4 times if not more. For example St. Petesburg NPP still has 2 РБМК-1000(same as in Chernobyl, but modernized) built in 1980(and 1981). Both are planned to be decommisioned in 2025.

Unlike other mechanical devices/engines it can't be serviced because of the radiation involved.

If reactors were unservicable, then there would be no need in NPP personel.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Both are planned to be decommisioned in 2025.

My point exactly. They have planned decommissioned dates because they cannot be serviced and maintained safely forever.

Unlike other mechanical devices/engines it can’t be serviced because of the radiation involved.

If reactors were unservicable, then there would be no need in NPP personel.

I disagree. During the lifetime operation of a plant they need personnel, it's not an All or Nothing thing. They don't just turn off the lights and shut the door and all walk out.

Hell, even after a plant starts it's decommission plan, which can take 10 to 20 years, they still need personnel.