this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
56 points (98.3% liked)

askchapo

22879 readers
115 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think we will get some “break throughs” in Quantum Computing that Google execs will assure us makes their company worth five trillion dollars.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 27 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The problem with quantum as the next bazinga hype is that there's nothing to point to while soyfacing

[–] BobDole@hexbear.net 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 16 points 3 days ago (5 children)

You can't point at a qbit it just looks like a regular chip but in a fridge and everything it can even hypothetically do is boring behind the scenes nerd shit.

With the "self driving" car you can point at a car with sensors and shit strapped to it, with the "AI" you can point to the slop it generated.

With quantum, what do you point at? A little notification on your bank's account website that says "your account is now Quantum Secure?"

[–] duderium@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Someone hasn't been paying attention to Star Trek, since blue quantum torpedoes are clearly much better than regular shitty red photon torpedoes.

[–] Runcible@hexbear.net 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You can't point at a qbit it just looks like a regular chip but in a fridge and everything it can even hypothetically do is boring behind the scenes nerd shit.

yes, I frequently find that tech journalism is held back by its rigid adherence to truth

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago

It's not even about adherence to truth, it's that there's nothing there to even lie about

[–] BobDole@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago

I doubt that will stop them from doing it anyway. They’ll use an AI generated image of a chip that looks like “quantum”

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

A little notification on your bank's account website that says "your account is now Quantum Secure?"

that's still meaningless until somebody proves that Quantum computers actually can break pre-Quantum encryption in practical human time frames (like minutes/days/weeks) and non-state actors can purchase such hardware.

Would be funny if we ended up in a future where the FBI smugly said "We don't need your password, we'll just Quantum in!" and the Quantum computer averages 1.5 years on most iPhones.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

The AI hype is meaningless too but that doesn't stop them from doing it.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah that's kinda my point, quantum is so boring that even the meaningless fluff and hype is boring

[–] Sickos@hexbear.net 2 points 3 days ago

Ok but dilution fridges are really cool