this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
20 points (91.7% liked)

Canada

7411 readers
548 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 6 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

In last half hour, plan is for 25% tariffs on everything, Saturday, with oil decided whether exempt or not, tonight.

Fentanyl was always BS. It is about extorting Canada to surrender sovereignty. Just on fentanyl, it is used in hospitals because it is cheapest opiate. The danger from it,overdosing, is exclusively over contaminating other drugs such that dose is too high. Not that US gives a shit, but making the hospital product the same potency as morpheine, or just going back to morpheine, would be a big step towards making it safer, because some illicit use comes from hospital supplies.

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 hours ago

If they exempt oil we definitely need to slap a 25% export tax on it. Give the revenue to Alberta if that's what it takes. Get Mexico on board too.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

It's just theater, it will cause massive problems to have tariffs on our land borders. Expect to see temporary reprieves as long as there is bribes or concessions. It's just a way to steal money and be corrupt.

[–] yannic@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

You've got an interesting take on grammar, and you have me at a disadvantage. I'd love to understand what you just wrote in your first paragraph.