this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
69 points (98.6% liked)

PC Gaming

9572 readers
836 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Those are both much cheaper than the 5080 and significantly cheaper than the 5090.

[–] Senseless@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And most likely a lot slower as well. You should probably compare them with 5070 / 5070Ti.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most benchmarks I've seen put them around 5070ti for RT performance and 5080 for raster performance. They're about where AMD thought the 5070 was going to be before NVidia surprised us all with such a dissapointing launch.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

How does it compare to the RX 7800XT etc. tho?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are they suppsot to be competitive with nvidia top end?

[–] theboomr@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

According to AMD themselves, no.

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Which they aren't competing against. Compare it to 5070 and 5070ti. Benchmarks will be a bloodbath I reckon. (In nvidia favor)