this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
168 points (93.3% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

2051 readers
120 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

❶ Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

❷ Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

❸ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

❹ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

❺ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

❻ Don't be a dick.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 27 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

I love the idea but I think the categories can be improved.

The four axes are future tech, all-powerful government, everyone defending the system and actively participating, and street violence.

I also didn't realize until I did this that this 4-way Venn diagram is incomplete. It's not able to represent the 2-way combinations from opposite sides:

  • Blade Runner = Gattaca + The Lottery
  • V for Vendetta = 1984 + A Clockwork Orange

Edit: Made some revisions for increased accuracy

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 13 points 5 months ago

"Of course, the book does not contain any hints on how to win the lottery. It is, rather, a chilling tale of conformity gone mad."

"Aww!"

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I was going to say I see no rhyme or reason in the original. I like yours.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 4 points 5 months ago

I am inordinately pleased and proud of myself for how well the different categories work out, for particular works being blended combinations of elemental individual works. 😃

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You really need to keep Brave New World in there.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's in there. It's one of the nigh-unreadable ones, tech + powerful dystopian government + people generally loving and supporting the system.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

This is going to be fun isn’t it?

[–] ouRKaoS 1 points 5 months ago

...and now I have my reading list for the next year!