this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
328 points (99.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

57305 readers
971 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In one of the AI lawsuits faced by Meta, the company stands accused of distributing pirated books. The authors who filed the class-action lawsuit allege that Meta shared books from the shadow library LibGen with third parties via BitTorrent. Meta, however, says that it took precautions to prevent 'seeding' content. In addition, the company clarifies that there is nothing 'independently illegal' about torrenting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rivalarrival 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Has anyone in the US ever been busted for downloading from a direct download portal?

Nobody in the US has ever been busted on copyright grounds for downloading anything, regardless of source. The law does not provide for enforcement against downloading; only uploading.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago

No, but even a baseless civil suit costs a lot of time and money to fight.

[–] quirzle@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's what I thought. I don't think their defense succeeding here really gets us anything new.

[–] Rivalarrival 14 points 1 day ago

It doesn't get us anything new. It does put a big, gaping hole in the FUD that has been spread about the supposed "illegality" of downloading.