this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
142 points (98.6% liked)

Data is Beautiful

2207 readers
10 users here now

Be respectful

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cron@feddit.org 9 points 3 months ago (13 children)

Its sounds odd for me that some countries plan banning fuel-powered cars in ~30 years.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think there is much left to ban by then.

[–] argon 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It promotes investing into electric cars tight now. Without the bans, some investors might be hopeful to still profit beyond the 30s. But with the ban, it's clear for all investors to invest in electric cars.

[–] cron@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

True, but why set a limit in 30-40 years?

Thats a whole generation, most people that work today will be retired by then (hopefully).

30 to 40 years ago, lead-free fuel, catalytic converters, airbags, and ABS became more common and started to become standard.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Because it is a useless gesture.

A polly knows they will likely not be in power when they set the target so when time comes their party can say 'see we had a plan but you voted us out of office so we couldn't act on it and the people you voted in didn't follow through with our plan.'

load more comments (11 replies)