this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
92 points (97.9% liked)

Privacy

34307 readers
1641 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

No photo

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 90 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 24 points 2 days ago

Yup, them "shadow profiles" will become sentient one day

[–] moe93@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Fuck! Thanks. Anyway my…ummm…friend can have his meta footprint deleted?

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Unless someone feels like breaking into a datacenter (and likely several cold backup facilities) and mechanically wiping data, that shit is there forever. Facebook deletes nothing.

[–] TARgz@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Never Delete Anything" is Standard at every place I've worked. What happens is that anything that is requested to be deleted is simply marked as "Deleted" in the database.

[–] afk_strats@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not to discredit or counterpoint what you're saying... But in some jurisdictions, that's illegal. As an example, California RTA/RTF laws make it a requirement that some data should be deleted unless there's a different legal standard requiring the data be kept. Enforcement? Who knows?

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Even Reddit doesn't delete your post(data) when you delete your account. You will have to do it. Yourself first, of you have hundreds of posts or comments

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The Nuke Reddit History Chrome extension is great for this.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Reddit has a change log of your comments. This does nothing to their underlying data

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago

it doesnt, but rather have all the comments deleted in any case.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

To add, not deleted stuff is what my favorite lawyers call "discoverable". Not sure how many lawyers Meta has but I'm betting at least one of them is reminding them deleting stuff is a good thing.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

mechanically wiping data

You mean thermite the drives while the employees are gone for a holiday/lunch?

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 16 points 2 days ago

If your friend is an EU citizen, they might have some luck with a GDPR request to delete all their data.

They also might not. Meta technically would have to comply, but there is no real way to know if they did.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago

Don't they ressurect dead accounts, and use the ai to post randomly

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Same response as the EU but for California.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's legal if they irreversibly anonymise it.

So the content you created will still be used to train AI with no consent from or payment to you.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And what? The EU has a trackrecord of pretty hefty fines. They won't risk it for this many users.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Think about it in terms of risk / reward or if you like, shareholder value.

If the value of the data exceeds the fine combined with the risk of it being discovered, the data will continue to exist.

Factor in the cost of actually guaranteeing that deleting something across all online, nearline, offline and archived data stores and the chances of anything being purposely deleted are not high.

Accidental data loss, sure, purposeful data loss, I can't see it happening.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

GDPR fines can reach up to $20 million dollars. That's not a business expense. That's quiet a dent in their quarterly balance sheet. And the EU has issued hefty fines in the past. This is not the USA we're talking about.

[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Actually GDPR fines can reach 3% of revenue if i recall my compulsory training correctly. That's a lot more than $20m for farcebook I would expect

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's up to $20 million or 3%.

[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just checked, it's 4% of revenue and apparently Meta has already had a €1.2 Billion fine yes that B is not a typo.

https://dataprivacymanager.net/5-biggest-gdpr-fines-so-far-2020/

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

Didn't know that. That us quiet a big fine. I doubt they can expense this every quarter

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Again, you vastly underestimate the size of Meta.

In the last quarter of 2024 it shows a net income of $20,838 million. A $20 million fine would change that 3 into a 1 and again, that's net income for just for three months.

Source: https://investor.atmeta.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2025/Meta-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2024-Results/default.aspx

[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How about a $1.2 Billion fine ? Would that perhaps be consequential ?

They got hit with that 2 years ago

https://dataprivacymanager.net/5-biggest-gdpr-fines-so-far-2020/

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interesting, when you read that article, it says that Meta will appeal, searching for the GDPR fine and the appeal, all I found was more fines, but no records of the results of any appeals.

Also, it was €1.2 Billion, not $1.2 Billion.

[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Appeal never lodged as far as I can find searching tje Irish high court lists. They lodged appeals against a €90m fine though which started hearing last week, and withdrew an appeal against a 2018 €251m fine

Yeah sorry, €1.2bn was USD $1.3billion at the time and about 1.25bn now, so hardly misleading though.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 1 points 22 hours ago

I only noticed the € vs $ because I was searching for the case, so all good.

It's telling that they continue to attract fines. I saw the ones you mentioned also but didn't have the energy to start digging.

Despite assertions made to the contrary in this thread, I'm not at all convinced that they're doing anything other than maximising shareholder value to the exclusion of all other considerations, including making a risk assessment in relation to paying fines versus compliance with the law.