this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
534 points (99.1% liked)

World News

41370 readers
3006 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 37 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

Most of us want the shithead gone just as bad as you do, but too many dumbshits decided they'd rather not stop him because the alternative wasn't perfect. I hate it here.

[–] wischi@programming.dev 29 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Most? He already was president and over 50% voted that guy into office again? How are most people against him?

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 10 points 3 hours ago

He didn't get 50% of the vote.

He won be cause either 6 million people didn't vote or, to quote Trump, "[Elon] knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers. Those vote-counting computers. And we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide."

[–] mdurell@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

A surprisingly large number of people don't vote. I refuse to believe that anything approaching half of voting-age Americans support this. Unfortunately, here we are.

[–] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 33 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Everyone who didn't vote supports this.

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If as many people who turned up to vote would turn up to protest, things would change. Alas, liberals who think filling out the ballot is enough democracy for 4 years are not friends of democracy.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 26 minutes ago* (last edited 26 minutes ago)

Of course liberals arent friends of democracy.

Liberals refuse to replace First past the post voting with a more representative electoral system in the blue states they control. You can see them here, in this thread, circlejerking over the fact that people are unrepresented by their options at the polls.

We will most likely be using FPTP voting for the mid terms, and these same blue conservatives will be howling about 3rd parties existing. All while doing nothing to fix the spoiler effect that is inherent in the mathematically flawed voting system most states use.

[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I don't think I would say non-voters support this.

But they sure as fuck are complicit in not stopping an OBVIOUS threat to democracy by failing to do the absolute bare minimum civic duty of voting.

Edit: fixed grammar

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

And even more didn't vote in 2024 than 2020- and most of those who didn't vote this time would have otherwise voted against Trump. 50% of US votes is far far less than 50% of people eligible to vote in the US.

[–] runeko@programming.dev 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

50% of the people that voted in the last election voted for him. Some people didn't vote, so about 33% of those that could vote voted for him. Since the election, his approval ratings dropped about 15-20%, so about 25% of those able to vote still support him.

[–] Screamium@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Further, it's 50% of the people in the swing states that really decide things. I'm sure most New Yorkers and Californians that didn't vote did so because they knew their state would go blue regardless.

[–] runeko@programming.dev 5 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Yep. The rule of thumb is that if you were in a swing state, your vote counted for about 5-6 votes because of the way the electoral college works.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 23 minutes ago

Democracy ™️

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

There is no equal representation as long as the lower house is capped and the upper house is equal.

I have the same representation as millions of empty acres of land. It's fucking bullshit. Taxes should work respectively. Your votes are worth more? Cool, foot the bill instead of me funding your backwards empty fucking state.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 3 points 5 hours ago

"They didn't know"^TM^

[–] atempuser23@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No, most of you either directly voted for him or didn't care if he won.

[–] iegod@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago

Definitely not most.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

most of you decided voting was too much of hassle