this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
878 points (99.2% liked)

News

25461 readers
5403 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 205 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (7 children)

I wanted to point out something about what Trump said during that meeting...

“You’re in a bad position right now. You don’t have the cards.”

My understanding is that Ukraine did have the cards, they were called nukes, but they gave them up for peace and guarantees of protection from the United States, and others, against invasion.

And then, they got invaded.

Twice.

Edit: https://www.npr.org/2022/02/21/1082124528/ukraine-russia-putin-invasion

Edit2: Always pay attention to what the other hand is doing.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago

Because of Traitorapist Trump, every country in the world will rightly want to have their own nuclear weapons now. You just know that today is going to be mentioned in the history books as the beginning of widespread nuclear proliferation and the dire consequences that follow.

[–] froh42@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The scary thing is - ignoring these protection guarantees kills nuclear non proliferation.

Ignoring Ukraine for now, with a few French nukes we don't have enough in Europe to do nuclear deterrence. The US not being a trustworthy partner anymore and with Russia on our doorstep that means long term we simply need more of our own. I hate the thought, but can't find a way around it.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago

The French and UK nuclear arsenal is the only thing standing between humanity and disaster. Sad to say this but you guys need to be pumping those things out fast.

[–] coyootje@lemmy.world 95 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

He also incorrectly tried to correct Zelensky on when his fucking country was invaded... Clown

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago

Encapsulates why trump has no business near power of any kind. The most confidently incorrect dickhead anyone will ever meet

[–] Tja@programming.dev 17 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

The other hand just released that trumps name shows up 7 times in Eppstein's flight logs.

No, not a joke, it was released today by trumps own minions.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Tja@programming.dev 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

This is where I saw it, top result for me of the last 24h:

https://lemmy.world/post/26156436

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 24 points 20 hours ago

Three times.

The Donetsk conflict was started by militias trained, supplied, and paid by Russia. With Russian troops entering Donestk for technical support, logistical support, and really just any help they needed including combat units to beat back the Ukrainian Army at several points.

Donetsk was the actual "Special Military Operation".

[–] Idontopenenvelopes@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Trump, like every arogant POS has overestimated his strength. Europe can and will enter the conflict as Russia has proven itself to be an existential threat. NATO is dead, but EU has been planning for this. I wouldn't be surprised if UKR already has or will obtain a nuke and put on a show of force . Nuking Russian troops on its own territory would be fine- and provide ground denial to the Russians.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

NATO is dead

Somebody better tell them. In the meanwhile, their twin sibling, OTAN, will take over.

I wouldn’t be surprised if UKR already has or will obtain a nuke

I'd think they would have stopped their war by now if so.

Nuking Russian troops on its own territory would be fine

I'm sure Mr. Radiation will cooperate and not float over any innocent cities, and will stay inside of the political borders where the bomb went off.

I'm also sure that nobody would consider retaliating over something like that, as it would be taken as just a minor misunderstanding.

And yes, /s .

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] Idontopenenvelopes@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Winds blow east in that part of the world.

They were counting on US support so they played nice. If Europe fails to do anything meaningful we might see UKR do something incalculable.

UKR knows that the only way to stop Putin is to match his posture. They have openly stated last year that they should get a nuke since US is unreliable.

Retaliate for nuking their own territory?

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Winds blow east in that part of the world.

[Chernobyl has entered the chat]

Retaliate for nuking their own territory?

So nuke one of the largest 'bread baskets' in the World?

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] Idontopenenvelopes@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Cut off a limb to save the body. Radiation contamination is a pretty effective ground denial strategy- make those eastern oblasts uninhabitable for a 100years. That would afford some time for Russia to turn itself inside out.

I'm not suggesting it's any planners first choice, but it would certainly protect the border from further ground invasions.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Didn't Russia have the keys to those nukes though?

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 10 points 18 hours ago

Wouldn't have mattered even if true. Physical access trumps everything. Worst case scenario, if they really wanted to, they could reverse engineer the primer & guidance system, then replace the originals with their own.

Keep in mind that Ukraine was a massive hub for military industry in the USSR.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

My understanding was that Ukraine did.

But also, since they were neighbors, you wouldn't need to launch missiles, you could just take the payload out of a missile, stick it in a briefcase, and walk it over.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~