this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
566 points (78.8% liked)

Political Memes

6402 readers
3636 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 158 points 1 day ago (32 children)

I voted for Kamala. My parents and grandparents did as well. I do not feel that the democrats were/are doing jack shit to court new voters. The party itself expects to just be the status quo and have people vote for it. Whether people want to admit it or not, the point of being a progressive party is to be... how do I put this... PROGRESSIVE.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Oh yeah, make no mistake, the Dems are fucked.

It's just that in '24 we had an option between "continue having a flawed democracy" and "put a literal fascist in power", and a lot of us are still sore over folks who insisted that choosing the latter was some form of leftism. They weren't a major force in the general electorate, but here on Lemmy, they were certainly loud, so a lot of bad feeling remains.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The only argument for voting trump while thinking “left” that I can think of, is that all that anger and chaos leads to a big reform of the political landscape where there is a way for a more social system in the end

But I’d consider that an extremely risky move..

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's literally the accelerationist/anti-electoralist religious doctrine. And I say "religious doctrine" because they keep insisting that people will rise up if they assist in the sacrifice of enough LGBTQ+, POC, and other vulnerable people, despite there being absolutely no evidence in history of that ever occurring, even under brutal totalitarian dynasties that lasted hundreds of years.

[–] CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee 2 points 18 hours ago

They don't care about the sacrifices. They may say they do but you really can't if you advocate for accelerationism.

[–] tomenzgg@midwest.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But I’d consider that an extremely risky move..

So we all get to discover in real time!

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

True that 😂

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Very, very well put. I voted for Kamala as well, and this is what I'm trying to scream from the rooftops. The democrats seem to see the current populist moment as an excuse to phone it in. It keeps blowing up in the face, and they keep saying "oh well, I guess we need to move right / let the voters learn their lesson"

[–] lightrush@lemmy.ca 4 points 20 hours ago

That's literally the program which benefits their donors.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The party itself expects to just be the status quo and have people vote for it.

When the alternative was Trump and Project 2025, that's exactly what most should have voted for.

But stopping DEI was more important than Social Security for the majority of voters

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Peope can't afford their bills and the Democrats were out there saying the economy is stronger than ever. They had no intention of helping people and you are shocked that people didn't go out to vote. If it's damned if you do, damned if you don't, most people will chose the latter

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They should at least have voted third party.. I think many people should have voted third party.. Why do so few people vote third party?

[–] bishbosh@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they are too apathetic to vote for dems, they certainly won't go out of their way to make a statement and vote third party.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

because voting third party is useless and only helps trump to win since you're wasting your vote

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Still better than not voting at all. Would not give the same signal if republicans win with 40% of votes VS winning with more than 50% of votes.

Additionally, if the regular voting base for third parties grows, it exponentially makes more sense voting third party.
It is like driving backwards away from a really near wall where you parked sideways against it: you have to get just a bit closer to the wall with your nose, but as soon as the tail starts to get away from the wall, the distance grows exponentially faster over time.

I think best for US would be alternative conservative parties besides republicans.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In a first past the post voting system like america has, third parties will never get a significant amount of votes. Even if they would get like 5%, which would be a lot for a third party (10 times the amount of the green party in 2024), it would make no difference whatsoever on the election outcome. Sure the winning party might have a smaller margin on the popular vote, but that's totally irrelevant since you can win the election without a majority on the popular vote anyway.

Then 5% of the population has wasted their vote, and if they're smart they won't repeat that mistake by the next election and make their vote actually matter. I don't think the exponential thing works because people who voted third party will probably regret their decision as it leads to a win for the greater evil party.

I agree that if you do not live in a swing state, your vote doesn't really matter anyways and voting third party might make sense. However in general, voting a third party only makes sense when at least 1/3 of the population does the same, which is never gonna happen.

The only way for America to get out of this two party competition, is to change the voting system and make it actually proportional like a real democracy. Obviously neither of the parties will ever change the system because it benefits them, so that change might require some significant events to happen...

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 3 points 23 hours ago

Well, you are right 😌 I’m just too optimistic, but that is a personal trait that I know I have 😸

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was stronger than under Trump. Everyone forgot they had to fight for toilet paper under Trump.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 7 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Only an absolute moron would believe that the economy was better in 2024 than in 2019 for your average person. You can't blame the poor economy on Biden, but you can absolutely blame the DNC for not spputing off reforms to help people.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

I could be wrong about this: But I increasingly feel that the major issue for most of these people was economic instability - not making enough to make ends meet. But, out of a feeling of humiliation around saying “im poor” the message instead targets points of blame; either to potentially spare more dollars for themselves, or just genuinely to lash out at a world that’s succeeding without them.

Doesn’t make the approach of their message in any way valid or okay. I’m just explaining that they needed an answer to their struggles. Trump gave them an elaborate lie about it, which to them was better than nothing.

The democrats are a liberal party which is why they got almost 49% of the vote instead of under 1%.

load more comments (28 replies)