this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
666 points (89.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

29127 readers
3739 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Until we do, we can't stop the current funding source. Feel free to present your argument on your proposed alternate method.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Have the rich actually pay taxes. Use that.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If you're actually serious, you have to do better than that for an answer. How are you going to tax them? What are you going to tax them on? Who is considered rich?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's as fine tuned a proposal as, "tax property".

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Tax property" has finely enumerated rules completely spelled out in the letter of the law in hundreds of different variations across many states and cities. You can certainly disagree with it, but its a fully formed and executed system that is funding many schools today.

What you've got so far in this discussion is "stop what is currently in place and make someone else pay somehow". Thats not even fully formed thought much less an argument that can be defended. Your first statement, and now this follow up tell me you're really interested (capable?) of proposing a better alternative.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm not going to "finely enumerate and spell out the letter of the law in hundreds of variations" for you.

Income and wealth taxes also have hundreds of variations and fine tunings. Saying I have to invent a whole new system on my own right here and now or else I'm not serious is not serious.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I’m not going to “finely enumerate and spell out the letter of the law in hundreds of variations” for you.

I didn't ask you to. I asked you to add some actual substance to what you're proposing instead of simply hand waving "someone should do something somehow" which is useless and ineffectual. Your stance will mean the status quo is maintained, and I personally don't want that.

Income and wealth taxes also have hundreds of variations and fine tunings. Saying I have to invent a whole new system on my own right here and now or else I’m not serious is not serious.

How about even just one part of your propose solution? You've given absolutely nothing except "rich people". You've offered nothing that can be acted on. If you want change, you have to be able to talk about what change you want. If you can't talk in reality, then yes, you are not serious.