this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
1090 points (98.6% liked)

Memes

48499 readers
2534 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/27121839

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So that's why they changed the shape. I saw no valid reason so I just assumed they were trying to evade taxes in some way. I'll admit I have no idea how much anything I buy at a convenience store costs.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If anything the taller cylinder will use more aluminum for the same volume, so they're kinda shooting themselves in the foot here with aluminum and steel tariffs, lol

Seems pretty clear the only reason for this was to change the price without as many people noticing.

[–] GrosPapatouf@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

The tall cans have more surface area. It does mean slightly more materials (but not that much because the can thickness is not uniform), but also more visibility in vending machines and stores. It's a purely marketing decision.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Regular cans are somewhat inefficient shapes as well, shorter and fatter would be more economical, but less ergonomical and for once that won out, for a while anyway. Now we get designed by marketing instead.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, there's an awesome video on aluminum drink cans from TheEngineerGuy on YouTube. The ideal shape for holding pressure with minimal material is a sphere, but there's 2 problems with that: They roll, and can't be packed as efficiently as cylinders.

[–] Zess@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

This is over a year old and completely made-up.

[–] imvii@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not sure of the shape change reason, but I prefer the thinner cans. I have a candy store with soft drinks and I can put more of the thinner cans on the shelf. Usually one more can per shelf.

[–] Yoga@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the cans were even shorter (closer to cube/ more efficient for amount of aluminum used) you might be able to put 2 on top of eachother

[–] imvii@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Love it!

Make it happen, captain.