this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
1092 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

66892 readers
5040 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AmbiguousProps 82 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Roku is bad, I have one older Roku ""smart"" tv that I just block from accessing the internet entirely, and use a shield with a custom launcher instead.

[–] dugmeup@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] AmbiguousProps 54 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

So, I use regex to block all Roku domains on my network via pihole:

(ads|logs|cloudservices|image|images|web|prod.mobile|wwwimg|captive|customer-feedbacks|amoeba|amoeba2|sr|giga.sb|cs).roku(.admeasurement)*.com$

Then, possibly overkill due to the above, I used OpnSense firewall rules to block all traffic from my Roku tv. I think I just got fed up with seeing Roku spam in my pihole, as the above regex seems to completely "break" Roku.

After that, I set up FLauncher (following the method #2 instructions on the gitlab page) on my shield. This makes it so I only see the Roku launcher for a few seconds while the shield starts up, and then I'm dropped straight into flauncher. I chose flauncher because it's very simple and barebones, so you might want to explore other options if you want more advanced features. I don't really need those features since I'm usually using an app anyway.

Note that I did all of that after the tv was configured and set up, YMMV if it's a brand new tv as it may need to call home to do the initial set up.

[–] amphy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Had no idea FLauncher existed. Thank you so much

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Shoutout to the PiHole team!

[–] shadshack@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why is your Roku TV even on the Wi-Fi if you just block its internet?

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They have models that blink the large white LED light until it’s connected to WiFi. Annoying as hell.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can fix that in 3 seconds with a piece of electrical tape.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, I suppose. I don’t use the rock UI, it goes straight into the Apple TV when powered on so I don’t really care that much.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

You using an OTA tuner with some HD Homerun app or anything? Boooo needing Roku’s interface for antenna TV (on Roku smart TVs) cuz Apple didn’t solve for that (why would they I guess, $treamers as they are)

It didn’t look like there was any fantastic super easy OTA solution for Apple TV. Fine for us but maybe not the elderly. IDK

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It does until it doesn't. Did you look at the OP?

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I read the article before I saw it here (I follow ars). What they describe hasn’t been my experience. I press the power button on the Apple TV and it HDMI-CECs the TV power on and changes the input to the Apple TV HDMI eArc channel. They could change that behavior but it would break HDMI-CEC.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

HDMI-CEC is controlled by the TV...

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

HDMI-CEC is a communication standard.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, I am aware. The device sends a signal to turn the TV on and switch the input. There's nothing preventing the TV from refusing to immediately comply.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

That’s why I said it would break CEC. They could, but it s not a good idea.

[–] AmbiguousProps 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Oh yeah, I totally forgot about that - mine does do this, and the LED is right in the bottom middle, and it's super bright.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Sounds like a job for some black tape.

[–] AmbiguousProps 1 points 1 day ago

It probably doesn't need to be - but it was required to set up. Before I had my shield, I allowed local connections for local streaming, but you are correct, it's probably no longer necessary.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Depending on the model there's also a dev menu that disables some phoning home/connectivity shit

[–] dugmeup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks! I have nothing brand new as I am le poor :)

[–] firadin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Is there any point in getting anything above the bottom tier Shield? Just trying to use it to replace my chromecast/stream tv and youtube

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] fishpen0@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lemmy especially sleeps on the Apple TV more than most communities. It’s a solid box that has no ads and no privacy issues. Plex, Jellyfin, etc… all installable. With apples track record on previous versions of the Apple TV, software updates and support for about a decade

[–] firadin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I assume being Apple that it's not possible to sideload apps not supported on the app store? In particular I'd like to use some kind of a SmartTube or other youtube app that is ad free

[–] fishpen0@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can use sideloadly but IIRC you need a Mac for it to work. My YouTube workflow is a YouTube-dl wrapper that pipes into jellyfin for the small handful of things I still watch from YT, so I’m less familiar with live YouTube interfaces to know which ones are out there.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

Ahahahaha that’s awesome

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago

That is correct.

But which do you want? Privacy or convenience? No one makes a streaming device that does both.

[–] consumptionone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I have been using an onn 4k streaming box, which runs Google TV. They're $20. It's pretty easy to disable the default launcher and have it boot to Flauncher. Then you can side load smart tube for an ad free YouTube experience asking with Plex, stremio, or whatever else you want to stream.

[–] melfie@lemmings.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Same. I think it’s also possible to flash them with LineageOS, but swapping out the launcher and using adb to remove anything superfluous is all I’ve done so far.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've got a couple of those that I bought shortly after the LTT video, but I'm still using my Roku because I still haven't gotten around to jailbreaking and configuring them.

[–] consumptionone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Do it. It's very easy, and then you can ditch the Roku. There's even an ADB app you can load to remove unwanted apps on-device.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Nvidia has destroyed the stock Shield TV experience with ads, but it's easy to install custom launchers like Projectivy. The underlying system is still a privacy nightmare, but I don't care that Nvidia knows what TV shows I watch.

I mean, I do care, just not enough to use something like Kodi as my primary TV interface. Maybe if I used any ad supported services I'd feel differently, but I don't, so meh.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not Nvidia, that's Google.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, Google is an inextricably linked to all Google TV issues, but they didn't force Nvidia to ruin the Shield TV'S launcher with ads, and other bloat.

At least, not as far as I know. If you have sources saying otherwise, I'd be happy to take a look.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

but they didn't force Nvidia to ruin the Shield TV'S launcher with ads, and other bloat.

The "Shield's launcher" is just Android TV... Nvidia did not write their own Android launcher just for this device.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Fuck me. You might be right, as I haven't actually used the stock launcher since the big ad update years back.

I just remembered my original launcher having a lot of a Nvidia specific integrations, but I guess those could have just been bolted on at the system level.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You should not buy a Shield. They haven't been updated since...2019? And there's really no reason to. Get the $20 WalMart one.

[–] FoD@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They just put out a huge update for the shield. Mine still plays the vast majority of things perfectly, even hevc and 4k content. I am perfectly happy with my shield pro. I'd buy one again if the current one shits the bed.

What are my other options? Apple TV and what else? Everything else is ad ridden underpowered and lacking licenses to play media.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They just put out a huge update

I obviously meant a hardware update.

What are my other options?

Anything that runs on Android TV?

Everything else is ad ridden

And the Shield doesn't have ads? You can bypass all the ads by installing productivity launcher, same as on the Shield.

underpowered

How much power do you think you need to stream videos?

and lacking licenses to play media.

I don't even know what that means.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

As someone who owns both Nvidia Shield TV and standard cheap (Google certified) devices, all running Projectivy, it's not really comparable.

The Shield runs smoother, has significantly less minor/annoying issues, and actually receives fairly regular updates.

Now, the new Chromecast with Google TV does get updates, but it doesn't resolve the first two differences.

If you can't afford, or justify the extra expense, for an Nvidia Shield TV, completely understandable. But don't pretend that the user experience is the same, because it's not.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

All "standard cheap" devices are not the same. I recommended a specific one, which was tested and featured on LTT.

I also own both and there's no discernable difference, other than one costs literally 10x more.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I said Playstore Certified, and yes, they are mostly the same when you look under the hood, at least for those classes of devices, per generation.

Same, or similar SoC, with 2/8 (sometimes 2/16) specs.

Once you get up to the 4/32 range, you're already looking around the same price (+/-) of a Shield TV.

Also, lol @ citing LTT, for anything. Just because a broken clock is right twice a day, doesn't change the fact that it's broken.

And for the sake of being fair, I didn't even mention the 1/8 boards.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Okay, clearly you have no interest in learning anything new. Have a nice day.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I'm confused. Are you saying YOU can't tell the difference, or that their is no technical difference?

Because, anecdotally, I've owned a variety of these devices, and I can absolutely tell the difference. Which sucks, because I bought cheaper devices hoping for reasonable parity of experience. I'm not saying my cheaper devices are bad, just that clearly the Shield TV performs better.

As to the actual specs, there is also clearly a real world difference between the bog standard Amlogic SoC (1/8, 2/8, 2/16), and the Tegra SoC.

It's entirely reasonable to argue that the difference isn't worth the extra cost, fine. But it's dishonest to say there is no appreciable difference.

TBF I haven't used the newer "low cost" Shield with the 2/16 Tegra SoC, so I can't really speak to how it performs relative to something like Chromecast with Google TV.

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

The hardware is 10 years old and it wasn't even shiny at the time. Shield is a damned joke.