this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

College Football

836 readers
7 users here now

A community to discuss college football.

Find your team's community

Join the Fanaticus Discord

Vote in the community poll

/c/CFB Poll Top 25 Fanaticus
1. Oregon Oregon
2. Miami Miami
3. Ohio State Ohio State
4. ~~Penn State~~ Penn State
5. Notre Dame Notre Dame
6. Indiana Indiana
7. Georgia Georgia
8. ~~Texas A&M~~ Texas A&M
9. Texas Texas
10. BYU BYU
11. Tennessee Tennessee
12. ~~Clemson~~ Clemson
13. ~~Iowa State~~ Iowa State
14. Alabama Alabama
15. ~~Pitt~~ Pitt
16. LSU Louisiana State
T-17. ~~Kansas State~~ Kansas State
T-17. SMU SMU
19. Ole Miss Mississippi
20. Army Army
21. Boise State Boise State
22. ~~Illinois~~ Illinois
T-23. Colorado Colorado
T-23. Washington State Washington State
25. ~~Virginia Tech~~ Virginia Tech

Check out our other sports communities!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
Home Team Away Team Time Venue Notes
Duke ^13^ Clemson Mon 9/4, 8:00 PM ET Wallace Wade Stadium
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nurple@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I cannot possibly understand the reasoning for that being a deadball foul.

[–] TheAndrewBrown@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Here’s how the logic makes sense to me:

A late hit is a hit after the play is dead. If he were to have slid, stood up, walked towards the sideline, and then been tackled out of no where, that still would’ve been a late hit and I don’t think anyone would say Clemson should get a 1st down for something that happened so long after the play.

So since there is a “too long”, you have to have something thay designates when is too long. And for this, it’s once the play is dead, that’s the description of the penalty.

And for this play, it was dead as soon as he began his slide, by rule. And as soon as the play was dead, it became Duke ball.

And I don’t think there’s anything wrong with that. Committing a penalty after a play is over shouldnt change how that past play worked. Otherwise, it’s like the rule NFL used to have where excessive celebration after a TD could take away the score

[–] nurple@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I understand this, and I suppose it does make sense. But it did create a situation here where a team was essentially not penalized for targeting.

[–] Manibusan@fanaticus.social 1 points 1 year ago

This is a good explanation. Thanks!

[–] wjrii@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Football and legalistic ticky-tack rules... name a more classic combination.

[–] Manibusan@fanaticus.social 2 points 1 year ago

Oh well, at least people can’t say we benefitted off of it.