this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
1676 points (98.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

7072 readers
3144 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't farm people. It's a home not a financial instrument. If you want riches produce something of value. In that scenario you're just jamming yourself between someone and their basic need for shelter with your hand out. A different problem than climate change to be sure, but problematic all the same.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hm I don't know man. I'm not a landlord, I don't even own a home. But I see renting as a useful service. Do landlords and estate companies abuse people? Absolutely. But I don't see renting as evil per se. Buying a house/flat is a huge personal investment and risk, and I'm happy to rent for the time being until I'm ready to buy.

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We could have co-op's, instead we have profits. I wish you all the luck in buying your own home. But for me, where I'm at, I will forever pay rent to never own anything. Forever a second class citizen. All these apartments I've lived in with rents calculated not by necessity, but by what the market will bear. I'm pissed, and I think you should be too.

[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your problem is with capitalism, not landlords.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The landlord would be the capitalist in this scenario, no?

[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Everyone is, some are just in better positions than others.

To me, this very much seems like a "don't hate the player, hate the game" type of situation. It's like companies not paying their "fair" share of taxes - they're just following the laws. It's up to us to change them if we don't like it, just like the issue of having soulless corporations as landlords.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup, it's pretty disgusting when rents are allowed to increase by inflation (or more) instead of the average salaries.

Co-ops do exist, but they are so rare. I wonder how hard it is to start my. Own co-op?

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Idk the specifics, but I know the cards are stacked against it. It's tougher to find banks that will do business with you, and a lot of the tax breaks homeowners, condo owners too, get, aren't available to co-op's.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

It makes sense because if you can't pay your loans, the bank will literally take your house, so it's win win for them. If you can't pay the rest of the co-op, they only get some shares of a building full of hippies 😬 gotta get rich first, then I can make my own co-op.