this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
259 points (97.4% liked)

politics

22568 readers
4202 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Plans for a potential Trump third term are already being discussed, despite constitutional limitations.

Trump's former strategist Steve Bannon has suggested they're "working on it," while Trump himself has made several hints about running again after 2028.

Some Republicans, like Congressman Andy Ogles, have proposed amending the 22nd Amendment to allow three terms.

Constitutional law professor Michele Goodwin warns that Trump's administration has already shown "a display of lawlessness" with controversial executive orders and policies, while critics note Democratic opposition has been largely absent, allowing these discussions to gain traction.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rivalarrival -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

It's not being ignored, at least not by the people who actually matter: We The People.

The constitution tells us that he's currently the president. We are following the constitution.

When the constitution tells us someone else is president, we'll follow that, too.

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The constitution declared him ineligible to hold the position because he is a proven insurrectionist ... But here we are... the courts declared the constitution wrong and he was to be put on the ballot.

Trump should have been behind bars but the judiciary branch did not want to make haste nor prosecute an up and coming president ... so here we are...

He put unelected people in places that they have absolutely no knowledge of, nor had they any security clearance, but no one dares to challenge them or Trump about it.

He's stealing public funds here and there, under the guise of "savings from fraud" but no one knows where the money will be siphoned off to... and no one dares try to stop it.

He is disappearing people for no reasons other than not liking someone's opinion, and denies them any form of legal recourse. They just dissappear.

He's installed unmonitored internet in the White House through Starlink, no one tries to stop it or enquire what the need for that is.

He is trying to start wars over territory that is not his, think about that, a US-president personally being a warmonger, for no reasons other than his own.

He unabashedly promised no more need to vote after he was elected, already has multiple people promoting a 3rd term. And we're now supposed to think this will be the reason someone will rise up to stop him? Or a senator here and there will dare to claim power from under him just because Trump's term ended?

I'm waiting for the moment Trump actually shoots someone, in the white house or his palace in Florida, and it's all laughed off with some lame reason.

He was in the elections as a presidential candidate, but everyone knew he'd be elected as a dictator, and as such he nor his cronies will not simply go away at the end of his term.

He can't even just go away, he'd have various lawsuits hanging above his head, so he'll keep his power for as long as he can.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The constitution says much more than just who is president, and not everything it says is being followed.

But you know that.

[–] Rivalarrival 1 points 3 days ago

Of course I know that. I can't control whether Trump follows the constitution. I can't control whether you follow the constitution. I can only control my own actions. And as of 20 January 2029, Trump is no longer president.

If you're going to claim otherwise, you do so at your own peril.