this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
23 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38724 readers
135 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ganymede@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

if this is a full RISCV implementation in 2D materials this is a genuinely impressive breakthrough!!

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

an article from ars says it is the full instruction set

The resulting processor involves 5,900 individual transistors and is capable of implementing the full 32-bit version of the RISC-V instruction set, which necessarily means it includes sophisticated circuitry like the RISC-V instruction decoder.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2025/04/researchers-build-a-risc-v-processor-using-a-2d-semiconductor/

[–] ganymede@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for the reference, from there I found the very impressive original Nature paper "A RISC-V 32-bit microprocessor based on two-dimensional semiconductors" fantastic stuff!!

From the paper, that's almost a 40x improvement on comparable logic integration!

Some notes from the paper:

  • Transistor channel length is 3 um
  • Clock speed is 1 kHz

Typically this is where people like to shit on the design "cos muh GHz" etc, but tbf not only will people doubtless work on improving the clock speeds etc, but there's plenty of applications where computation time or complexity isn't so demanding, so i'm just excited by any breakthrough in these areas.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

Exactly, I think the whole idea of using a new substrate is very interesting. It's also going to be interesting to see if power requirements might end up being lower which could be a huge advantage as well.