this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
19 points (95.2% liked)
Self-hosting
3325 readers
18 users here now
Hosting your own services. Preferably at home and on low-power or shared hardware.
Also check out:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
@bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
@sylver_dragon@lemmy.world @JASN_DE@feddit.org @jonathan@lemmy.zip @jackalope@lemmy.ml
It can be, but a large percentage of WP installs aren't even blogs that manage posts over time. They are basic 20-30 brochure-ware sites that use WP as a page builder.
WP is popular with .edu sites where they are managing thousands of structured content types; faculty profiles, academic programs, events, etc.
Drupal is also a popular solution for that type of project where managing a large amount of structured data is a key feature.
My experience has been that WP needs to "built up" to handle large site while Drupal needs to "burned down" to be a good fit for small, page building projects.
Though Drupal's new preconfigured Drupal CMS installer with "recipes" for different use cases is making it a better option for smaller site projects.
https://new.drupal.org/drupal-cms
Regardless if individual projects use the whole feature set, it has the functionality and capability out the box. Saying it's not a CMS is a silly nitpick.
Honestly I think you're actually the one nitpicking, my point was whether or not the technologies had a blog focus. And that is what my data supported.