this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
486 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19088 readers
4674 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

DONALD TRUMP SAID he “absolutely” plans to testify in the federal government’s case against him regarding classified documents he removed from the White House. “I’m allowed to do whatever I want … I’m allowed to do everything I did,” the former president told conservative podcast host Hugh Hewitt.

In an interview on “The Hugh Hewitt Show” that dropped Wednesday, the host asked Trump, “Did you direct anyone to move the boxes, Mr. President? Did you tell anyone to move the boxes?” referring to the boxes of more than 300 classified documents the federal government seized last year from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate.

“I don’t talk about anything. You know why? Because I’m allowed to do whatever I want. I come under the Presidential Records Act,” Trump replied, while also taking a quick detour to bash Hewitt. “I’m not telling you. You know, every time I talk to you, ‘Oh, I have a breaking story.’ You don’t have any story. I come under the Presidential Records Act. I’m allowed to do everything I did.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes it is. Ohhh that reminds me of when Obama and Hillary decided to destroy the country of Libya and then NATO refused to participate in post war investigations and threatened the UN that they’d better not find any evidence of NATO war crimes there lol

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

They didn't destroy Libya. Gaddafi did when he massacred his own people during an already-ongoing civil war. NATO did nothing but impose a no-fly zone, because Gaddafi was massacring civilians with helicopters.

NATO also had obtained the voted support of the UN Security Council to impose this no-fly zone.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_military_intervention_in_Libya

Did you want the US to invade Libya? Cool, me too. Would've saved Libyans from slavery. The international community didn't want that.

Highly relevant - this wasn't even US-led:

From the beginning of the intervention, the initial coalition of Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Italy, Norway, Qatar, Spain, UK and US[34][35][36][37][38] expanded to nineteen states, with newer states mostly enforcing the no-fly zone and naval blockade or providing military logistical assistance. The effort was initially largely led by France and the United Kingdom, with command shared with the United States.

So not only not bad, and not illegal, but also not even a US mission.

[–] Count0@lemmy.villa-straylight.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why is Sarkozy in jail again?

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

For bribing judges and illegal campaign funding. How is this relevant?

Also, fuck Sarkozy not just for that but for this:

In an interview with Le Figaro in August 2023,[187] Sarkozy said that Ukraine should remain "neutral" and not join NATO or the EU; that France and Russia "need each other"; and that Macron should "renew dialogue" with Putin

[–] Count0@lemmy.villa-straylight.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where did the Illegal campaign financing come from?

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Man if you look it up, a fucking lot of places. The Libyan guy's money he stole was only one piece of it.

Dudes a real shitbird.

[–] Count0@lemmy.villa-straylight.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do you think France, under the leadership of Sarkozy, largely led the initial effort against Libya?

This isn't, as you say, a US led mistake. Also, the treatment of the franco-sphere areas of Africa are extremely horrible. France is not a country you want to be a colony of.

You don't have to justify the murderous actions of another countries empire.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't think it was a mistake. I think the UN should have occupied Libya after Gaddafi fell.

I definitely agree re French colonies. Maybe the worst thing about colonialism is the total lack of responsibility colonial powers felt after their colony was "liberated," because it will impact so many more generations than the actual colonialism.

That being said, Gaddafi was a murderous tyrant and I'm glad he's dead.

Also I doubt very seriously Sarkozy supported that intervention to get that money, since he would have gotten that money without said intervention and also because the money wasn't tied to the intervention but to oil deals. French imports of Libyan oil have declined precipitously since the intervention

https://www.statista.com/statistics/459740/france-total-amount-petroleum-imported-libya/

Declined further than domestic production

https://www.statista.com/statistics/265194/oil-production-in-libya-in-barrels-per-day/

You keep insulting me as if I'm going to feel bad about knowing more than you. Conspiracy theories aren't a good look. Real life is complicated.

[–] Count0@lemmy.villa-straylight.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You don't know more than me. You think you do because you believe US propaganda, and only US propaganda. You take it at face value and get sanctimonious about people who actually do know more than you.

I don’t think it was a mistake. I think the UN should have occupied Libya after Gaddafi fell.

Cause that would go so well. It went well for Korea, Vietnam, Haiti, Iraq, Afghanistan. I mean hell, name one American occupation that has gone well. The only ones I can think of are Japan and Germany. Both of which notably never really punished the financial elites in those countries for their crimes. But that is a distraction. Can you name me an American Occupation that didn't result in horrific war crimes, or resulted in a stable government in the last 80 years?

This is why some of the others are calling you a monster.

Also, and I know pre-emptively you'll ignore this and call it a conspiracy theory, but to be pedantic, Sarkozy didn't need more money, he already had it. It was to destroy the documentation for the money that he had already received. It was to destroy the evidence.

I'd also love to see your blood thirst be applied evenly, because it isn't. Frankly, the worst country in the world by basically every metric, we're perfectly fine with. Specifically Saudi Arabia.

[–] MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re an extremely disgusting human being lol. At this point you’ll excuse the worst crimes against humanity imaginable because you think doing so is owning Trump

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Nope I just know what reality is.