Trying to understand why I had these opinions, I recalled how much different being a man felt at 18 versus 28. I had no money which I presumed meant I had no value to the opposite sex. I wanted the company of women and girls, but I also resented them because I lacked experience in dating and my few experiences were rocky. A lot of magazines and headlines focused on the shortcomings of men and boys in the early 2010s, and it was easy for me to get negatively polarized into thinking it was a personal attack. Academic feminism did and does a much better job explaining patriarchy better than blogs and news sites which boiled down systems of sexism to individual behaviors.
My experience as a resentful teen boy wasn’t unique. It’s the same experience that millions of boys are going through, which they’d ordinarily grow out of by the time they hit their twenties. In my case, it was happening during a period of social revolution on gender and during an evolution in mass communications. Many of these early communities on Atheism, which captured me for their sensibility and anti-orthodoxy, evolved into anti-progressivism and eventually evolved into the Redpill and Manosphere which is how millions of young boys today engage with their gender. At least my period in this mindset was short lived: about two years. By the time 2016 rolled around, I had clearly lost interest in online gender wars as tyranny seemed a greater threat. I was now 24 and actively attending college; I had plenty of friendships and dating experiences with women, and that teenage resentment was forgotten.
The big crisis we’re dealing with today is that the resentment is not only not expiring when men get into their twenties, but it’s being weaponized globally by parties against men’s material interests. What young boys like me didn’t realize when we were being lectured about patriarchy and the problems of men, is that being a man is an extremely privileged position over women, we’re just not old enough to benefit from it yet. This presents a problem on how we teach oppression and discrimination to young people who have little autonomy of their own and feel bad when you imply your immutable characteristics harm people you seek validation from.
this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
29 points (100.0% liked)
Feminism
1983 readers
1 users here now
Feminism, women's rights, bodily autonomy, and other issues of this nature. Trans and sex worker inclusive.
See also this community's sister subs LGBTQ+, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC
Also check out our sister community on lemmy:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The thing this article touches on, and what I’ve found people really need to understand, is what privilege is and what it represents. It took me to a similar age as the author (early 20s) to recognize it. I find most people don’t even in much later years. They feel attacked for having it, and don’t think they do, so they resent those they feel are attacking and right wing groups feed that resentment.
I know I’m preaching to the choir given this community and server, but anyone else that comes across this statement, please understand you can still be privileged in some ways, even if you’re very much not in others. You can grow up in poverty, in a broken home, or no home, picked on and bullied, and still benefit from an interviewers racism or misogyny. You may even think “fuck that, I was the best qualified” or even “I was the only one that applied” but it’s always possible the company in question already had a reputation amongst disenfranchised groups to encourage exactly that situation. Without trying, you could benefit from a system that holds people back. That’s privilege. It’s not always getting a head start, sometimes it’s just not being set back as far as others.
Honestly, this may be one of the concepts that it would be better to bring to people once they've already found some kind of leftist solidarity. If you take someone steeped in right-wing rhetoric and the first hurdle you put in front of them is expecting humility and understanding before you even give them a reason to want to understand? I don't think that's a terribly effective approach.
If the first thing I say to a cis person is that they have privilege that I lack because I'm trans, I'm doing a few things right out the gate that probably aren't going to get them to listen. First, I'm highlighting the separate categories that we're in rather than the unified categories that we're in. Second, I'm asking them to defer to my experience of the world and to show sympathy and understanding before I even attempt to win them over. Third, I'm asking them to start from a place of humility before I've shown that I can be trusted with the very vulnerability that I'm requesting.
I find it's much easier to look for common ground first and foremost. Find the ways that they have to struggle and recognize that struggle. Show them that I have some of the same exact struggles that they do. Often this comes down to health, finances, or other experiences that are more universal. It doesn't even necessarily have to be a shared struggle, it can be a shared interest. But whatever it is, the first step has to be highlighting affinity. There's a reason people talk about the weather, because we're all in it together. Rain falls on everyone.
Once they see that we're not so different, they tend to be much more willing to hear the stuff that's outside their experience. You might even be able to highlight patterns like the interplay of intersectional privilege. But if you try to start from there? Good luck.
Complain about traffic. Complain about the price of eggs. Hit enough of those universals and they won't be so skeptical when you bring something that requires them to stretch a bit to the table.
Our problem, I think, is that we've largely got the cart entirely before the horse.
Yeah, I personally struggle with the concept of 'privilege' because of this, and I'm AFAB. My introduction to privilege was a man telling me that my life had been easy because of my skin tone. He linked to an article about how privilege was 'easy mode' and tried to say that being a rape victim wasn't an excuse for finding his rape jokes in poor taste, I was born more privileged than him and just needed to sit with my discomfort. I quit that particular activist group after that, since it was clearly not as feminist as they wanted people to think.
This was ten years ago, and I still can't help but wonder what definition of 'privilege' people are rolling with when they use the term, because the pop culture version is so fucked up.
It doesn't help that I was raised to have the 'complaining is just insulting people who have it worse' mindset. Thanks to that, even the 'not being set back as far' rhetoric has a big unspoken 'so stop making a big deal out of it' attached that the pop culture definition plays into. Like, I chose to be homeless to escape my abusive family, and I feel like a poseur when I talk about it because I'm alive and housed now, so it clearly wasn't that bad.