believes in this
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
157 points (97.6% liked)
Slop.
459 readers
300 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
With all due respect, Comrade, and I genuinely wish you and DSA success in everything, but the B&R people I met have been some of the absolute worst people I've encountered in organizations. That makes me feel even more skeptical. I hope I'm wrong and the types are completely different now. Could also just be the branches I've worked with.
Idk about B&R particularly. I just lurk the national forums. I've never gone to a convention or anything.
@anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 2nding that B&R sucks, every member of my ydsa chapter (which i will admit were either all ML or sympathetic to ML ideas) who went to the YDSA conventions while i was a part of the org said that B&R was by far the worst caucus, and if they suck in YDSA which might as well be the 2nd coming of the bolsheviks when compared to DSA i shudder to imagine what they're like in national.
I must ask you to please be more specific in your criticism. They suck how exactly?
I've never been to convention and don't engage with caucuses directly. To me anyone who explicitly engages in a caucus must be a sicko of some sort.