this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
449 points (98.9% liked)

World News

45984 readers
5640 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grimtuck@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As someone that is British I take exception to the idea the V2 rocket somehow demoralised us, even temporarily. It takes a lot more than that to break us. It was a scary weapon, sure. But it didn't reality make the reality of the war that much worse than it already was.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You can take offense at history but it's a fact constant air raids were a major demoralizing factor. That's not a shameful thing, its a natural reaction and no amount of "stuff upper lip"-ing really changes that.

It was a scary weapon, sure.

What's another word for scary? Terror. It's a terror weapon not a practical weapon.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

That's the thing though, they weren't demoralising. Bombing civilians is always pointless and has no measurable effects on the military outcome(except if they hit a factory that is making weapons or something like that). The Allies did make the same mistake though, in bombing civilians thinking it was demoralising the Nazis...

https://www.pushkin.fm/podcasts/revisionist-history/the-bomber-mafia

The only thing bombing civilians garuntees is that your enemy will continue fighting, so if you're wanting to conduct a genocide without using death camps, its quite effective for that...

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You just admitted they were.

We just discussed how they were ineffective militarily.

That did succeed though.

What is this podcast supposed to do exactly?

Lastly "Nuh uh" is a bad argument.