this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

History

23648 readers
17 users here now

Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.

c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting

Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).

When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.

Historical Disinformation will be removed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source book:

Stalinist values by David hoffmann.

Other parts of the chapter basically says the time and energy wasted on individualist bourgeois bustin decadence is time better spent learning to work for the better of the collective.

TL:DR - Nutting is counter-revolutionary. :volcel-vanguard: .

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] space_comrade@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

Does this book contain actual facts or is it just propaganda?

If this is true it's kind of a garbage take tbh.

[–] ssjmarx@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It tracks for me, the 30s saw more than a little bit of reactionary social politics. This is the period when abortion and homosexuality would get re-criminalized.

[–] space_comrade@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why did reactionary social politics creep into the USSR at that time? It seems like it started off good during Lenin's time.

[–] ssjmarx@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

It's a topic I should do more reading on, but the feeling I get is that it was a backlash to the highly progressive currents of the 20s. It affected nearly everything - the Soviet Union had some of the first schools for the blind and deaf, then some of them got shut down. There were women's work programs, then they got replaced with "traditional family" propaganda. Stalin is undoubtedly the source for some of it, but he was also the head of a huge and popular movement so he can't be solely blamed.

[–] space_comrade@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Damn that sucks, those programs sounded based as fuck. Why are people always everywhere so resistant to such stuff? Like my dudes you literally toppled a centuries old imperial order basically overnight but you can't bear deaf people and women getting an education?

[–] FuckYourselfEndless@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Also the bulk of the population, rural peasants, weren't exactly the same as the forward-looking avant-garde artists from the city, sadly.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] ssjmarx@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I looked at my source again and it seems I misremembered - it wasn't that the progress for the disabled was all reversed, it was that one of the pioneers in the field of special education (I. A. Sokolyansky) was arrested in the Great Purge and his school was shut down, but when he was released in 1940 he was able to go to Moscow and get a new job doing the same thing at a different university so clearly it wasn't a universal thing.

load more comments (5 replies)