this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
1190 points (96.7% liked)

World News

46022 readers
3135 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Social media influencers are fuelling a rise in misogyny and sexism in the UK's classrooms, according to teachers.

More than 5,800 teachers were polled... and nearly three in five (59%) said they believe social media use has contributed to a deterioration in pupils' behaviour.

One teacher said she'd had 10-year-old boys "refuse to speak to [her]...because [she is] a woman". Another said "the Andrew Tate phenomena had a huge impact on how [pupils] interacted with females and males they did not see as 'masculine'".

"There is an urgent need for concerted action... to safeguard all children and young people from the dangerous influence of far-right populists and extremists."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 112 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Let's not pretend like these children aren't having this behavior reinforced by their parents.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 87 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The internet has made it quite easy for kids to develop an "inner life" that their parents have little to no awareness of, regardless of how attentive they are, though it's obviously worse if they are not.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 56 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Guess what, it's your job as a parent to keep your kids off the Internet then.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I developed an inner life, it was the only peace I could find from the daily assault that was my outer life. Sure in the past it was more visible habits like reading a book, but letting kids have some autonomy over their lives is important I feel

[–] MonkeMischief 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're totally right. Without that inner life we'd just be forced into being exactly like our parents because we wouldn't grow as individuals.

I think the problem is when, hypothetically, that inner life that finds you first is a profit-driven hate-brewing death cult brought to you by an algorithm. Then these people "totally get you" and gives you a "community."

I miss when those unsupervised inner life communities were mostly around hobbies or games or whatever to escape life drudgery and make real friends. MySpace wasn't about viral brainwashing campaigns, YouTube was mostly creation for fun's sake, and even with online games and such, we all knew there was a separation between "the Internet" and "Real Life(TM)".

Everybody knew not to take the Internet seriously, because it was a place you went to escape everything else. Nothing really mattered on the internet.

I think now people don't really see a separation. The Internet is real life, in the worst way.

Now so much of it is a minefield of recruitment and manipulation to enlist in culture wars for clicks. There's labels and lifestyles that act as "funnels" and "pipelines" to increasingly toxic extreme identities that find "belonging" in being captive mindslaves and profit-cattle to any number of "influencers."

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago

Completely agree. The people I found online in those early days were just random people without any motive or incentive to sell me on an ideology. There was a trust back then, because opinions weren't really worth anything and no one could access your wallet.

Finding that some community now is a total minefield for users, young or old. So much of the internet has been gamified for a profit/scam at any cost.

I wish that kids could just connect with other random kids across the world like I did, but I think those days are likely done.

[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago

That’s it. From what I hear (in Germany) is that the number of students with problematic behavior has increased, yes. That is something teachers can handle, if the parents cooperate or at the very least not interfere.

Unfortunately the number of problematic parents has sharply risen as well. More seem to be taking a page out of the Trump playbook of never admitting anything and going on the offensive instead. They can become quite aggressive and belligerent when their kid faces consequences for their actions, especially if misogyny was involved.

It’s impossible to help these students, if they act out behavior they see at home or, often enough, from their divorced fathers, and are encouraged for it.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Behavioral issues start at home.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because the kids are digesting the content at home?

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Not necessarily, but in my experience with my friends' kids, the ones that are the most maladjusted are the ones with their faces buried in their phones all the time, and these are the same kids that were raised on iPads and YouTube all day. It's one thing to have an hour or two of screen time in a day, but the parents that don't limit it have the kids with the most behavioral problems.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Where did the parents get it? Why did they get it? Why don't they know better?

I'm not being cheeky. I want to know real answers to that shit.

[–] Sektor@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

Since i have a kid with autism i notice how little other people with regular kids invest in them. When the kid starts to walk and talk at the age of two, they basically expect of them to act as adults, and I'm not exaggerating. After that kids get a minimal amount of time that parents address to them. Kids are given a phone too keep them not asking for parents attention, which is formative for their social and emotional skills. You don't learn that from other kids or Jake Paul. So it's a combination of shitty parenting and extremely toxic place where people spent hours every day. If you are a developing person it will fuck you up.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As a Millennial that had young parents I was always dumbfounded by my peers’ boomer parents. It’s like they just went to work and treated their kids like an afterthought, and they were too stuck in their greedy consumer mindset and didn’t have a clue about what we consider today the most basic of tech.

It’s not hard for me to imagine that my generation went on to raise kids poorly. I don’t have children myself but I’ve seen plenty of people my age raising them.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

You paint a picture I'm familiar with, but didn't experience firsthand. You were my friends and acquaintances I grew up with.

I'm late Gen X/Millennial cusp. The oldest of three siblings, both of whom are squarely Millenials. I got computers, but I also enjoyed formative years without them. My parents are boomers, and were not perfect, but I feel like I got the right stuff from them.

I don't have kids. In the 90s when I was a teenager, I saw the writing on the wall and decided never to have children.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Let's not pretend that this is real news instead of phony clickbait from Sky effing News.