this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
961 points (98.0% liked)

Facepalm

3090 readers
889 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Thats socialism, which is meant to lead eventually to communism. The end goal is to have no state.

If my understanding is correct, that is.

[–] ace_of_based@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah, Lenin even stated this was the end-goal.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think it's possible for a state to give up power.

[–] ace_of_based@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

it's one of those things a lot of thought's been put into and commies themselves argue about. i feel it's great to conceptualize (and with it the differing definitions of "the state" as well) but i'm not a scholar anyway, this ain't the place, and it's moot since socialism needs to be achieved first anyway, after we beat this whole fascism thing. no point in worrying to much about it eh?

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be fair 🤓 since it's mostly theoretical, any definition of communism is going to be in flux as it has not achieved a shelf-stable real life application yet.

[–] Kommeavsted@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago

It's shelf stable in the same way as a clay pigeon.