Not The Onion

16102 readers

1162 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

928

Author of Texas bill to ban 'furries' in schools cannot come up with examples of it happening (web.archive.org)

submitted 2 days ago by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

104 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A Texas bill, known as the FURRIES Act, would ban non-human behaviors in public schools, including the use of litter boxes and wearing animal accessories.

Rep. Stan Gerdes, the bill's author, claimed schools were providing litter boxes for students acting as "furries."

When pressed, Gerdes could not find an example. The bill was left pending in committee.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Gun toting step father saturated in Faux News, he wasn't going to vote for Liberal Commies even if they put a gun to his head at the ballot box.

If I had bought that Glock and 12 gauge, and practiced with them monthly, I probably would have invested about $5K total in the gun safe and a couple of other weapons - plus the time and ammunition, and I would have happily surrendered them AT THE SAME TIME as all of my neighbors should we have gone full UK gun ban here in the US. Not that I am typical, but the real problem with gun ownership is that guns are so cheap basically anybody can get one if it is the least bit important to them. Investing $50K in guns doesn't make you any safer against the punk who walks up behind you with a .38 special. Banning guns, making them much harder to get and illegal to keep, that cuts down the number of punks who can get their hands on a .38 special in the first place.

[–] Rivalarrival 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This is the attitude I'm talking about. "Poor people are punks, who will walk up behind you with a .38spl. Guns should be more expensive to keep those filthy poors from getting them."

Centrist, corporatist, elitist crap.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Most punks I know aren't poor, they're just punks. They come from poor, middle class, and rich parents in pretty much equal proportion.

Your attitude is showing in your assumptions.

[–] Rivalarrival 1 points 45 minutes ago

That wasn't an assumption. That was your own words:

the real problem with gun ownership is that guns are so cheap basically anybody can get one if it is the least bit important to them.

Your argument doesn't apply to middle class and rich "punks". Your argument only applies to the poor.