this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
118 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2846 readers
975 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Wisconsin man charged with crimes for a school shooting committed by his daughter is the latest U.S. parent taken to court for violence caused by a child

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Australia isn't remotely comparable. They never had the gun culture we have and the guns that were turned in were a bunch of rusty beaters no one wanted. (If you know what you're looking at, there are plenty of pics out there.)

They never had the shear number and variety of guns we have. And those numbers have expanded wildly in the past decade or two. For example, no one really new what an AR was until they were banned, now it's the most popular rifle in America.

Most important, Australia didn't have a constitutional right to bear arms. Doesn't matter if you agree, doesn't matter how you parse the words, the 2A exists and the courts have almost always upheld it.

Also, Australia didn't ban guns.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Nailed it.

60% was Australias turn in rate...they had around 1mil guns in civ hands at that time. If we had a 60% turn in rate, we'd still have over 100 million firearms in civ hands. On top of that, like you said, Australia has more guns now than before the ban.